ArticleJournal of molecular evolution1991
Essential factors determining codon usage in ubiquitin genes.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation between codon usage and thermostability.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2006Article
- Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families.Annual review of genetics · 2005Review
- Purifying selection and birth-and-death evolution in the ubiquitin gene family.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000Article
- Higher frequency of concerted evolutionary events in rodents than in man at the polyubiquitin gene VNTR locus.Genetics · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ubiquitin is ubiquitous in all eukaryotes and its amino acid sequence shows extreme conservation. Ubiquitin genes comprise direct repeats of the ubiquitin coding unit with no spacers. The nucleotide sequences coding for 13 ubiquitin genes from 11 species reported so far have been compiled and analyzed. The G + C content of codon third base reveals a positive linear correlation with the genome G + C content of the corresponding species. The slope strongly suggests that the overall G + C content of codons of polyubiquitin genes clearly reflects the genome G + C content by AT/GC substitutions at the codon third position. The G + C content of ubiquitin codon third base also shows a positive linear correlation with the overall G + C content of coding regions of compiled genes, indicating the codon choices among synonymous codons reflect the average codon usage pattern of corresponding species. On the other hand, the monoubiquitin gene, which is different from the polyubiquitin gene in gene organization, gene expression, and function of the encoding protein, shows a different codon usage pattern compared with that of the polyubiquitin gene. From comparisons of the levels of synonymous substitutions among ubiquitin repeats and the homology of the amino acid sequence of the tail of monomeric ubiquitin genes, we propose that the molecular evolution of ubiquitin genes occurred as follows: Plural primitive ubiquitin sequences were dispersed on genome in ancestral eukaryotes. Some of them situated in a particular environment fused with the tail sequence to produce monomeric ubiquitin genes that were maintained across species. After divergence of species, polyubiquitin genes were formed by duplication of the other primitive ubiquitin sequences on different chromosomes. Differences in the environments in which ubiquitin genes are embedded reflect the differences in codon choice and in gene expression pattern between poly- and monomeric ubiquitin genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.