ArticleNucleic acids research2006
A supersecondary structure library and search algorithm for modeling loops in protein structures.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- A roadmap for systematic humanization of a chimeric antigen receptor: preclinical validation of a humanized CD22 scFv as a model.Experimental hematology · 2026Article
- Exploring the structural lexicon of the Proteome via Metric Geometry.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Exploring the Structural Lexicon of the Proteome via Metric Geometry.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Physicochemical, functional, and evolutionary characteristics of protein loop regions in human andBiophysics and physicobiology · 2025Article
- On Protein Loops, Prior Molecular States and Common Ancestors of Life.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Review
- Are Viruses Taxonomic Units? A Protein Domain and Loop-Centric Phylogenomic Assessment.Viruses · 2024Review
- De novo protein fold design through sequence-independent fragment assembly simulations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Tertiary Structural Motif Sequence Statistics Enable Facile Prediction and Design of Peptides that Bind Anti-apoptotic Bfl-1 and Mcl-1.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2019Article
- Computational design of structured loops for new protein functions.Biological chemistry · 2019Review
- Newly Synthesized Oxygenated Xanthones as Potential P-Glycoprotein Activators:Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Protein structural motifs in prediction and design.Current opinion in structural biology · 2017Review
- Development of a motif-based topology-independent structure comparison method to identify evolutionarily related folds.Proteins · 2016Article
- Tertiary alphabet for the observable protein structural universe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
- Conformational sampling and structure prediction of multiple interacting loops in soluble and β-barrel membrane proteins using multi-loop distance-guided chain-growth Monte Carlo method.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- Modularity of Protein Folds as a Tool for Template-Free Modeling of Structures.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- ArchDB 2014: structural classification of loops in proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Modeling proteins using a super-secondary structure library and NMR chemical shift information.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2013Article
- A modular perspective of protein structures: application to fragment based loop modeling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2013Article
- How long is a piece of loop?PeerJ · 2013Article
- Confidence-guided local structure prediction with HHfrag.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a fragment-search based method for predicting loop conformations in protein models. A hierarchical and multidimensional database has been set up that currently classifies 105,950 loop fragments and loop flanking secondary structures. Besides the length of the loops and types of bracing secondary structures the database is organized along four internal coordinates, a distance and three types of angles characterizing the geometry of stem regions. Candidate fragments are selected from this library by matching the length, the types of bracing secondary structures of the query and satisfying the geometrical restraints of the stems and subsequently inserted in the query protein framework where their fit is assessed by the root mean square deviation (r.m.s.d.) of stem regions and by the number of rigid body clashes with the environment. In the final step remaining candidate loops are ranked by a Z-score that combines information on sequence similarity and fit of predicted and observed phi/psi main chain dihedral angle propensities. Confidence Z-score cut-offs were determined for each loop length that identify those predicted fragments that outperform a competitive ab initio method. A web server implements the method, regularly updates the fragment library and performs prediction. Predicted segments are returned, or optionally, these can be completed with side chain reconstruction and subsequently annealed in the environment of the query protein by conjugate gradient minimization. The prediction method was tested on artificially prepared search datasets where all trivial sequence similarities on the SCOP superfamily level were removed. Under these conditions it is possible to predict loops of length 4, 8 and 12 with coverage of 98, 78 and 28% with at least of 0.22, 1.38 and 2.47 A of r.m.s.d. accuracy, respectively. In a head-to-head comparison on loops extracted from freshly deposited new protein folds the current method outperformed in a approximately 5:1 ratio an earlier developed database search method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.