Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16617088›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2006

Triggering and visualizing the aggregation and fusion of lipid membranes in microfluidic chambers.

Daniel J Estes, Santiago R Lopez, A Oveta Fuller, Michael Mayer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Scalable Synthesis of Planar Macroscopic Lipid-Based Multi-Compartment Structures.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Microtechnologies for membrane protein studies.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2008
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel J EstesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Santiago R Lopez
A Oveta Fuller
Michael Mayer
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICST32GM007544 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORAN, JOHN V. · 1985 to 2022
$11.3M
Cellular Biotechnology Training Program (CBTP) - Years 31-35T32GM145304 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Guizhi Zhu · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a method that makes it possible to trigger, observe, and quantify membrane aggregation and fusion of giant liposomes in microfluidic chambers. Using electroformation from spin-coated films of lipids on transparent indium tin oxide electrodes, we formed two-dimensional networks of closely packed, surface-attached giant liposomes. We investigated the effects of fusogenic agents by simply flowing these molecules into the chambers and analyzing the resulting shape changes of more than 100 liposomes in parallel. We used this setup to quantify membrane fusion by several well-studied mechanisms, including fusion triggered by Ca2+, polyethylene glycol, and biospecific tethering. Directly observing many liposomes simultaneously proved particularly useful for studying fusion events in the presence of low concentrations of fusogenic agents, when fusion was rare and probabilistic. We applied this microfluidic fusion assay to investigate a novel 30-mer peptide derived from a recently identified human receptor protein, B5, that is important for membrane fusion during the entry of herpes simplex virus into host cells. This peptide triggered fusion of liposomes at an approximately 6 times higher probability than control peptides and caused irreversible interactions between adjacent membranes; it was, however, less fusogenic than Ca2+ at comparable concentrations. Closely packed, surface-attached giant liposomes in microfluidic chambers offer a method to observe membrane aggregation and fusion in parallel without requiring the use of micromanipulators. This technique makes it possible to characterize rapidly novel fusogenic agents under well-defined conditions.

Indexed as

Membrane FusionElectrochemistryEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisLipid BilayersLiposomesMicroelectrodesMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastMolecular ConformationLipid BilayersLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID16617088
PMCPMC1479077
OpenAlexW2001872635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.