ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2006
Novel treatment approaches for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment options for patients with relapsed myeloma are a rapidly moving entity. Although autologous transplantation has improved outcomes for younger patients, the use of a second autologous transplant in the relapsed setting has less benefit. Nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplant is being studied in several large cooperative group trials, but to date early auto/mini-allo does not appear to be superior to tandem autologous transplantation. The greatest benefit in the relapsed setting has been demonstrated using novel targeted agents with biologically based therapies. The response rates from thalidomide with and without dexamethasone, bortezomib, and lenalidomide with and without dexamethasone clearly demonstrate high levels of activity with encouraging durations of remission. More recent studies are combining novel agents, and small phase I/II trials are demonstrating higher overall response and complete remission rates. The next generation of novel agents targeting heat shock proteins, the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, and monoclonal antibodies are further expanding the list of future potential agents. The rapid clinical development of targeting agents will give us more options to treat patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma, thereby improving quality of life and overall survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16615880What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.