Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16614250›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2006

Pathogenic potential of novel Chlamydiae and diagnostic approaches to infections due to these obligate intracellular bacteria.

Daniele Corsaro, Gilbert Greub

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Journal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Review
  5. IDCases · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical identification and microbiota analysis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Nested Species Distribution Models ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Clear Victory forFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. What is the true clinical relevance ofNew microbes and new infections · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniele CorsaroChlamydia Research Association, 12, rue du Maconnais, 54500 Vandoeuvres-les-Nancy, France.
Gilbert Greub
University of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel chlamydiae are newly recognized members of the phylum Chlamydiales that are only distantly related to the classic Chlamydiaceae, i.e., Chlamydia and Chlamydophila species. They also exhibit an obligate biphasic intracellular life cycle within eukaryote host cells. Some of these new chlamydiae are currently considered potential emerging human and/or animal pathogens. Parachlamydia acanthamoebae and Simkania negevensis are both emerging respiratory human pathogens, Waddlia chondrophila could be a novel abortigenic bovine agent, and Piscichlamydia salmonis has recently been identified as an agent of the gill epitheliocystis in the Atlantic salmon. Fritschea spp. and Rhabdochlamydia spp. seem to be confined to arthropods, but some evidence for human exposure exists. In this review, we first summarize the data supporting a pathogenic potential of the novel chlamydiae for humans and other vertebrates and the interactions that most of these chlamydiae have with free-living amoebae. We then review the diagnostic approaches to infections potentially due to the novel chlamydiae, especially focusing on the currently available PCR-based protocols, mammalian cell culture, the amoebal coculture system, and serology.

Indexed as

AmoebaAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialArthropodsBlotting, WesternCattleCattle DiseasesCells, CulturedChlamydiaceaeChlamydiaceae InfectionsChlamydialesCoculture TechniquesCulture MediaEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFish DiseasesHumansAntibodies, BacterialCulture MediaRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Identifiers

PMID16614250
PMCPMC1471994
OpenAlexW2137344219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.