Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16614068›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Limited evolutionary conservation of imprinting in the human placenta.

D Monk, P Arnaud, S Apostolidou, F A Hills, G Kelsey, P Stanier, R Feil, G E Moore

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 256 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Epigenetics · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Livestock species as emerging models for genomic imprinting.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

D MonkInstitute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom. dmonk@imperial.ac.uk
P Arnaud
S Apostolidou
F A Hills
G Kelsey
P Stanier
R Feil
G E Moore
Imperial College London · GBBabraham Institute · GBInstitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier · FRMiddlesex University · GBUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epigenetic phenomenon of genomic imprinting provides an additional level of gene regulation that is confined to a limited number of genes, frequently, but not exclusively, important for embryonic development. The evolution and maintenance of imprinting has been linked to the balance between the allocation of maternal resources to the developing fetus and the mother's well being. Genes that are imprinted in both the embryo and extraembryonic tissues show extensive conservation between a mouse and a human. Here we examine the human orthologues of mouse genes imprinted only in the placenta, assaying allele-specific expression and epigenetic modifications. The genes from the KCNQ1 domain and the isolated human orthologues of the imprinted genes Gatm and Dcn all are expressed biallelically in the human, from first-trimester trophoblast through to term. This lack of imprinting is independent of promoter CpG methylation and correlates with the absence of the allelic histone modifications dimethylation of lysine-9 residue of H3 (H3K9me2) and trimethylation of lysine-27 residue of H3 (H3K27me3). These specific histone modifications are thought to contribute toward regulation of imprinting in the mouse. Genes from the IGF2R domain show polymorphic concordant expression in the placenta, with imprinting demonstrated in only a minority of samples. Together these findings have important implications for understanding the evolution of mammalian genomic imprinting. Because most human pregnancies are singletons, this absence of competition might explain the comparatively relaxed need in the human for placental-specific imprinting.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomic ImprintingAllelesAmidinotransferasesAnimalsBase SequenceDecorinDNADNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHistonesHumansKCNQ1 Potassium ChannelAmidinotransferasesDCN protein, humanDcn protein, mouseDecorinDNAExtracellular Matrix Proteinsglycine amidinotransferaseHistonesKCNQ1 Potassium ChannelKCNQ1 protein, humanProteoglycansReceptor, IGF Type 2

Identifiers

PMID16614068
PMCPMC1564202
OpenAlexW2001766467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.