Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16612599›Full record

Trial reportCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2006

Dendritic cell-based multi-epitope immunotherapy of hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma.

Ying Waeckerle-Men, Edith Uetz-von Allmen, Markus Fopp, Roger von Moos, Christel Böhme, Hans-Peter Schmid, Daniel Ackermann, Thomas Cerny, Burkhard Ludewig, Marcus Groettrup and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Dendritic cell immunotherapy: clinical outcomes.Clinical & translational immunology · 2014
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ying Waeckerle-MenResearch Department, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Edith Uetz-von Allmen
Markus Fopp
Roger von Moos
Christel Böhme
Hans-Peter Schmid
Daniel Ackermann
Thomas Cerny
Burkhard Ludewig
Marcus Groettrup
Silke Gillessen
University of St. Gallen · CHHirslanden Klinik Aarau · CHUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy is a promising approach to augment tumor antigen-specific T cell responses in cancer patients. However, tumor escape with down-regulation or complete loss of target antigens may limit the susceptibility of tumor cells to the immune attack. Concomitant generation of T cell responses against several immunodominant antigens may circumvent this potential drawback. In this trial, we determined the immunostimulatory capacity of autologous DC pulsed with multiple T cell epitopes derived from four different prostate-specific antigens in patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsAutologous DC of HLA-A*0201(+) patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer were loaded with antigenic peptides derived from prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA(14-22)), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP(299-307)), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA(4-12)), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA(154-163)). DC were intradermally applied six times at biweekly intervals followed-in the case of an enhanced immune response-by monthly booster injections. Immune monitoring during the time of ongoing vaccinations (12-59 weeks) included ex vivo ELISPOT measurements, MHC tetramer analysis and in vitro cytotoxicity assays.

resultsOf the initial six patients, three qualified for long-term multi-epitope DC vaccination. This regime was tolerated well by all three patients. The vaccination elicited significant cytotoxic T cell responses against all prostate-specific antigens tested. In addition, memory T cell responses against the control peptides derived from influenza matrix protein and tetanus toxoid were efficiently boosted. Clinically, the long-term DC vaccination was associated with an increase in PSA doubling time.

conclusionsDC-based multi-epitope immunotherapy with repeated boosting in men with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma is feasible and generates efficient cellular antitumor responses.

Indexed as

Acid PhosphataseAgedAntigens, NeoplasmAntigens, SurfaceCancer VaccinesCarcinomaDendritic CellsGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIGPI-Linked ProteinsHLA-A2 AntigenHLA-A AntigensHumansImmunodominant EpitopesImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsAcid PhosphataseAntigens, NeoplasmAntigens, SurfaceCancer VaccinesFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIGPI-Linked ProteinsHLA-A*02:01 antigenHLA-A2 AntigenHLA-A AntigensImmunodominant EpitopesMembrane GlycoproteinsNeoplasm ProteinsProstate-Specific Antigenprostatic acid phosphataseProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesPSCA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID16612599
PMCPMC11031118
OpenAlexW2044274117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.