Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16612535›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2006

Processed pseudogenes, processed genes, and spontaneous mutations in the Arabidopsis genome.

David Benovoy, Guy Drouin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bioinformatics and genomic analysis of transposable elements in eukaryotic genomes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David BenovoyDépartement de biologie and Centre de recherche avancée en génomique environnementale, Université d'Ottawa, 30 Marie Curie, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
Guy Drouin
Marie Curie · GBUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We identified 411 processed sequences in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome based on the fact that they have lost their intron(s) and have a length that is at least 95% of the length of the gene that gave rise to them. These sequences were generated by 230 different genes and clearly originated from retrotranspositons events because most of them (91%) have a poly(A)-tail. They are composed of 376 sequences with frame shifts and/or premature stop codons (processed pseudogenes) and 35 sequences without disablements (processed genes). Eleven of these processed genes are likely functional retrotransposed genes because they have low Ka/Ks ratios and high Ks values, and their sequences match numerous Arabidopsis ESTs. Processed sequences are mostly randomly distributed in the Arabidopsis genome and their rate of accumulation has steadily been decreasing since it peaked some 50 MYA. In contrast with the situation observed in mammals, the processed sequences found in the Arabidopsis genome originate from genes with high copy numbers and not from highly expressed genes. The patterns of spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis are slightly different than those of mammals but are similar to those observed in Drosophila. This suggests that methylated cytosine deamination is less frequent in Arabidopsis than in mammals.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBase SequenceGenes, PlantGenome, PlantMutationPseudogenes

Identifiers

PMID16612535
OpenAlexW2005949853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.