Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16611830›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2006

Rapid taste responses in the gustatory cortex during licking.

Jennifer R Stapleton, Michael L Lavine, Robert L Wolpert, Miguel A L Nicolelis, Sidney A Simon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cortical Coding of Gustatory and Thermal Signals in Active Licking Mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Multisensory Integration Underlies the Distinct Representation of Odor-Taste Mixtures in the Gustatory Cortex of Behaving Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neural Activity in the Anterior Insula at Drinking Onset and Licking Relates to Compulsion-Like Alcohol Consumption.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptors in the Gustatory Cortex Influence Food Intake.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Active Licking Shapes Cortical Taste Coding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Encoding Taste: From Receptors to Perception.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer R StapletonDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. stapleton@neuro.duke.edu
Michael L Lavine
Robert L Wolpert
Miguel A L Nicolelis
Sidney A Simon

Funding

MODULATION OF TASTE RESPONSES BY THE TRIGEMINAL SYSTEMR01DC001065 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SIMON, SIDNEY A · 1991 to 2010
$3.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-01065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid tastant detection is necessary to prevent the ingestion of potentially poisonous compounds. Behavioral studies have shown that rats can identify tastants in approximately 200 ms, although the electrophysiological correlates for fast tastant detection have not been identified. For this reason, we investigated whether neurons in the primary gustatory cortex (GC), a cortical area necessary for tastant identification and discrimination, contain sufficient information in a single lick cycle, or approximately 150 ms, to distinguish between tastants at different concentrations. This was achieved by recording neural activity in GC while rats licked four times without a liquid reward, and then, on the fifth lick, received a tastant (FR5 schedule). We found that 34% (61 of 178) of GC units were chemosensitive. The remaining neurons were activated during some phase of the licking cycle, discriminated between reinforced and unreinforced licks, or processed task-related information. Chemosensory neurons exhibited a latency of 70-120 ms depending on concentration, and a temporally precise phasic response that returned to baseline in tens of milliseconds. Tastant-responsive neurons were broadly tuned and responded to increasing tastant concentrations by either increasing or decreasing their firing rates. In addition, some responses were only evoked at intermediate tastant concentrations. In summary, these results suggest that the gustatory cortex is capable of processing multimodal information on a rapid timescale and provide the physiological basis by which animals may discriminate between tastants during a single lick cycle.

Indexed as

Reaction TimeAnimalsBrain MappingCerebral CortexDrinking BehaviorElectrophysiologyMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansTasteWater Deprivation

Identifiers

PMID16611830
PMCPMC6673900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.