Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16611512›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2006

Increased awareness of intimate partner abuse after training: a randomised controlled trial.

Sylvie Lo Fo Wong, Fred Wester, Saskia S L Mol, Toine L M Lagro-Janssen

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of domestic violence training: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. What deters GPs from talking about sexual assault? a qualitative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  8. Tracking Interpersonal Violence: A 13-Year Review of Cases in a Referral Hospital (2009-2022).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Domestic violence: knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice of selected UK primary healthcare clinicians.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. How usual is usual care in pragmatic intervention studies in primary care? An overview of recent trials.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sylvie Lo Fo WongRaboud University Medical Centre, Department of Family Medicine/Women's Studies Medical Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. s.lofowong@hag.umcn.nl
Fred Wester
Saskia S L Mol
Toine L M Lagro-Janssen
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate partner abuse is very common among female patients in family practice. In general, doctors overlook the possibility of partner abuse.

aimTo investigate whether awareness of intimate partner abuse, as well as active questioning, increase after attending focus group and training, or focus group only. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial in a stratified sample.

settingFamily practices in Rotterdam and surrounding areas.

methodA full-training group (n = 23), a group attending focus group discussions alone (n = 14), and a control group (n = 17) were formed. Data were collected with incident reporting of every female patient (aged >18 years) that was suspected of, or presented, partner abuse during a period of 6 months. The primary outcome measure was the number of reported patients; the secondary outcome measure was the number of patients with whom the GP had non-obvious reasons to suspect/discuss abuse.

resultsComparison of the full-training group (n = 87 patients) versus the control group (n = 14 patients) resulted in a rate ratio of 4.54 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.55 to 8.09, P <0.001); the focus group only group (n = 30 cases) versus control group: rate ratio of 2.2 (95% CI = 1.14 to 4.26, P = 0.019); full-training versus the focus group only group: rate ratio of 2.19 (95% CI = 1.36 to 3.52, P = 0.001). Comparison of the fulltraining group with the untrained groups for awareness of partner abuse in case of non-obvious signs resulted in: odds ratio 5.92 (95% CI = 2.25 to 15.62, P <0.01) all corrected for sex, district, practice setting, working part/full-time, experience, and age of the doctor.

conclusionsTraining was the most significant determinant to improve awareness and identification of intimate partner abuse. Active questioning increased, especially where there were non-obvious signs. The focus group on its own doubled the awareness of partner abuse.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceFamily PracticeFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPhysician-Patient RelationsSocioeconomic FactorsSpouse Abuse

Identifiers

PMID16611512
PMCPMC1832231
OpenAlexW1894947628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.