ArticleThe Biochemical journal1991
Relative sensitivity to inhibition by cimetidine and clonidine differentiates between the two types of Na(+)-H+ exchangers in cultured cells.
Article in The Biochemical journal, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expression and protein kinase C-dependent regulation of peptide/H+ co-transport system in the Caco-2 human colon carcinoma cell line.The Biochemical journal · 1994Article
- Characterization of the inhibition by stilbene disulphonates and phloretin of lactate and pyruvate transport into rat and guinea-pig cardiac myocytes suggests the presence of two kinetically distinct carriers in heart cells.The Biochemical journal · 1993Article
- Human placental syncytiotrophoblast expresses two pharmacologically distinguishable types of Na(+)-H+ exchangers, NHE-1 in the maternal-facing (brush border) membrane and NHE-2 in the fetal-facing (basal) membrane.The Biochemical journal · 1992Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Available evidence indicates that there are two types of Na(+)-H+ exchangers, type A (housekeeping type) and type B (epithelial or apical type), in mammalian cells. We have recently reported, using isolated membrane vesicles, that these two types can be differentiated by their relative sensitivities to inhibition by clonidine and cimetidine [Kulanthaivel, Leibach, Mahesh, Cragoe & Ganapathy (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 1249-1252]. The present study was undertaken to determine whether this approach is also effective in cultured cells. The JAR human placental choriocarcinoma cell line and the opossum kidney (OK) cell line, when grown as confluent monolayer cultures on an impermeable plastic support, express Na(+)-H+ exchanger activity which is measurable by determining Na+ uptake into the cells from the culture medium. The JAR cell Na(+)-H+ exchanger was found to be about 100 times more sensitive to inhibition by dimethylamiloride than the OK cell Na(+)-H+ exchanger. Inhibition studies with clonidine and cimetidine were able to differentiate between these two exchangers very clearly. Cimetidine was 18 times more potent than clonidine in inhibiting the JAR cell Na(+)-H+ exchanger. In contrast, clonidine was at least 8 times more potent than cimetidine in inhibiting the Na(+)-H+ exchanger of the OK cell. The results show that the JAR cell expresses the type A Na(+)-H+ exchanger, whereas the OK cell expresses the type B Na(+)-H+ exchanger. This approach also proved to be very effective in correctly identifying the type of Na(+)-H+ exchanger in a third cell line (HeLa). It is concluded that the relative susceptibility to inhibition by clonidine and cimetidine offers an easy and efficient means of differentiating between the two types of Na(+)-H+ exchangers in cultured cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.