Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16606848›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

A Dirichlet process model for detecting positive selection in protein-coding DNA sequences.

John P Huelsenbeck, Sonia Jain, Simon W D Frost, Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genes and sites under adaptation at the phylogenetic scale also exhibit adaptation at the population-genetic scale.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Extent and Dynamics of Polymorphism in the Malaria Vaccine CandidateThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Probabilistic models of eukaryotic evolution: time for integration.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John P HuelsenbeckSection of Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0116, USA. johnh@biomail.uscd.edu
Sonia Jain
Simon W D Frost
Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond

Funding

Extending Bayesian Phylogenetic AnalysisR01GM069801 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI HUELSENBECK, JOHN P. · 2004 to 2013
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-069801NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most methods for detecting Darwinian natural selection at the molecular level rely on estimating the rates or numbers of nonsynonymous and synonymous changes in an alignment of protein-coding DNA sequences. In some of these methods, the nonsynonymous rate of substitution is allowed to vary across the sequence, permitting the identification of single amino acid positions that are under positive natural selection. However, it is unclear which probability distribution should be used to describe how the nonsynonymous rate of substitution varies across the sequence. One widely used solution is to model variation in the nonsynonymous rate across the sequence as a mixture of several discrete or continuous probability distributions. Unfortunately, there is little population genetics theory to inform us of the appropriate probability distribution for among-site variation in the nonsynonymous rate of substitution. Here, we describe an approach to modeling variation in the nonsynonymous rate of substitution by using a Dirichlet process mixture model. The Dirichlet process allows there to be a countably infinite number of nonsynonymous rate classes and is very flexible in accommodating different potential distributions for the nonsynonymous rate of substitution. We implemented the model in a fully Bayesian approach, with all parameters of the model considered as random variables.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticSelection, GeneticAnimalsBayes TheoremDNAOpen Reading FramesProteinsDNAProteins

Identifiers

PMID16606848
PMCPMC1458866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.