Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16603059›Full record

ReviewVirology journal2006

Retrograde transport pathways utilised by viruses and protein toxins.

Robert A Spooner, Daniel C Smith, Andrew J Easton, Lynne M Roberts, J Michael Lord

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virology journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. StaufenC facilitates utilization of the ERAD pathway to transport dsRNA through the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Search for Antidotes Against Ricin.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  5. Protein sorting from endosomes to the TGN.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert A SpoonerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. R.A.Spooner@warwick.ac.uk
Daniel C Smith
Andrew J Easton
Lynne M Roberts
J Michael Lord
University of Warwick · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 063058/Z/00/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A model has been presented for retrograde transport of certain toxins and viruses from the cell surface to the ER that suggests an obligatory interaction with a glycolipid receptor at the cell surface. Here we review studies on the ER trafficking cholera toxin, Shiga and Shiga-like toxins, Pseudomonas exotoxin A and ricin, and compare the retrograde routes followed by these protein toxins to those of the ER trafficking SV40 and polyoma viruses. We conclude that there is in fact no obligatory requirement for a glycolipid receptor, nor even with a protein receptor in a lipid-rich environment. Emerging data suggests instead that there is no common pathway utilised for retrograde transport by all of these pathogens, the choice of route being determined by the particular receptor utilised.

Indexed as

Protein TransportAnimalsBacterial ToxinsCytosolEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansMicePolyomavirusReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, VirusSimian virus 40Bacterial ToxinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, Virus

Identifiers

PMID16603059
PMCPMC1524934
OpenAlexW2098148530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.