Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16600044›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2006

Regional differences in multidimensional aspects of health: findings from the MRC cognitive function and ageing study.

Fiona E Matthews, Laura L Miller, Carol Brayne, Carol Jagger, Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Aging Study (MRC CFAS)

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Estimating stroke-free and total life expectancy in the presence of non-ignorable missing values.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2010
    Article
  6. Education differences in life expectancy with cognitive impairment.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2009
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fiona E MatthewsMRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, CB2 2SR, UK. fiona.matthews@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk
Laura L Miller
Carol Brayne
Carol Jagger
Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Aging Study (MRC CFAS)

Funding

Medical Research Council G9901400Medical Research Council MC_U105292687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferences in mortality and health experience across regions are well recognised and UK government policy aims to address this inequality. Methods combining life expectancy and health have concentrated on specific areas, such as self-perceived health and dementia. Few have looked within country or across different areas of health. Self-perceived health, self-perceived functional impairment and cognitive impairment are linked closely to survival, as well as quality of life. This paper aims to describe regional differences in healthy life expectancy using a variety of states of health and wellbeing within the MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS).

methodsMRC CFAS is a population based study of health in 13,009 individuals aged 65 years and above in five centres using identical study methodology. The interviews included self-perceived health and measures of functional and cognitive impairment. Sullivan's method was used to combine prevalence rates for cognitive and functional impairment and life expectancy to produce expectation of life in various health states.

resultsThe prevalence of both cognitive and functional impairment increases with age and was higher in women than men, with marked centre variation in functional impairment (Newcastle and Gwynedd highest impairment). Newcastle had the shortest life expectancy of all the sites, Cambridgeshire and Oxford the longest. Centre differences in self-perceived health tended to mimic differences in life expectancy but this did not hold for cognitive or functional impairment.

conclusionSelf-perceived health does not show marked variation with age or sex, but does across centre even after adjustment for impairment burden. There is considerable centre variation in self-reported functional impairment but not cognitive impairment. Only variation in self-perceived health relates to the ranking of life expectancy. These data confirm that quite considerable differences in life experience exist across regions of the UK beyond basic life expectancy.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthGeriatric AssessmentHealth SurveysLife ExpectancySelf ConceptActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCognition DisordersCohort StudiesFemaleGeographyHumansLife Change EventsMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID16600044
PMCPMC1475575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.