Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16600037›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2006

Genotyping of Bacillus anthracis strains based on automated capillary 25-loci multiple locus variable-number tandem repeats analysis.

Florigio Lista, Giovanni Faggioni, Samina Valjevac, Andrea Ciammaruconi, Josée Vaissaire, Claudine le Doujet, Olivier Gorgé, Riccardo De Santis, Alessandra Carattoli, Alessandra Ciervo and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. New Research on thePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genetic Diversity of AustralianMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  15. Coalescence modeling of intrainfectionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Predicting the Geographic Distribution of theThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. You Can'tFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Florigio ListaArmy Medical Research Center, Via Santo Stefano Rotondo 4 00184 Rome (Italy). florigio.lista@esercito.difesa.it
Giovanni Faggioni
Samina Valjevac
Andrea Ciammaruconi
Josée Vaissaire
Claudine le Doujet
Olivier Gorgé
Riccardo De Santis
Alessandra Carattoli
Alessandra Ciervo
Antonio Fasanella
Francesco Orsini
Raffaele D'Amelio
Christine Pourcel
Antonio Cassone
Gilles Vergnaud
Université Paris-Sud · FRIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITCharbonnages de France · FRIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata · ITMinistero della Salute · ITMinistry of Defence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genome of Bacillus anthracis, the etiological agent of anthrax, is highly monomorphic which makes differentiation between strains difficult. A Multiple Locus Variable-number tandem repeats (VNTR) Analysis (MLVA) assay based on 20 markers was previously described. It has considerable discrimination power, reproducibility, and low cost, especially since the markers proposed can be typed by agarose-gel electrophoresis. However in an emergency situation, faster genotyping and access to representative databases is necessary.

resultsGenotyping of B. anthracis reference strains and isolates from France and Italy was done using a 25 loci MLVA assay combining 21 previously described loci and 4 new ones. DNA was amplified in 4 multiplex PCR reactions and the length of the resulting 25 amplicons was estimated by automated capillary electrophoresis. The results were reproducible and the data were consistent with other gel based methods once differences in mobility patterns were taken into account. Some alleles previously unresolved by agarose gel electrophoresis could be resolved by capillary electrophoresis, thus further increasing the assay resolution. One particular locus, Bams30, is the result of a recombination between a 27 bp tandem repeat and a 9 bp tandem repeat. The analysis of the array illustrates the evolution process of tandem repeats.

conclusionIn a crisis situation of suspected bioterrorism, standardization, speed and accuracy, together with the availability of reference typing data are important issues, as illustrated by the 2001 anthrax letters event. In this report we describe an upgrade of the previously published MLVA method for genotyping of B. anthracis and apply the method to the typing of French and Italian B. anthracis strain collections. The increased number of markers studied compared to reports using only 8 loci greatly improves the discrimination power of the technique. An Italian strain belonging to the B branch was described, and two new branches, D and E, are proposed. Owing to the upgrading achieved here, precise genotyping can now be produced either by automated capillary electrophoresis, or by the more accessible but slower and for some markers slightly less accurate agarose gel methodology.

Indexed as

AutomationBacillus anthracisDNA, BacterialElectrophoresis, CapillaryGenetic MarkersGenotypePhylogenyTandem Repeat SequencesDNA, BacterialGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID16600037
PMCPMC1479350
OpenAlexW1596017453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.