Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16599649›Full record

Trial reportCNS drugs2006

Assessing therapeutic efficacy in a progressive disease: a study of donepezil in Alzheimer's disease.

Peter Johannsen, Eric Salmon, Harald Hampel, Yikang Xu, Sharon Richardson, Suzanne Qvitzau, Rachel Schindler, AWARE Study Group

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in CNS drugs, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01772095 (A 6 Months, Prospective, Open-label, Observational, Non-interventional Clinical Trial to Examine the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01772095 completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

A 6 Months, Prospective, Open-label, Observational, Non-interventional Clinical Trial to Examine the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil (Dementis®) Administration in Patients With Dementia.

TypeobservationalSponsorElpen Pharmaceutical Co. Inc.Ran2013 to 2013Enrolled389ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, Dementia, Cognitive Disorders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Pharmacological interventions for apathy in Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter JohannsenMemory Disorder Unit, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. peterj@dadlnet.dk
Eric Salmon
Harald Hampel
Yikang Xu
Sharon Richardson
Suzanne Qvitzau
Rachel Schindler
AWARE Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the value of continued donepezil treatment in patients with Alzheimer's disease for whom clinical benefit was initially judged to be uncertain.

methodsThe study consisted of three phases: (i) a 12- to 24-week, pre-randomisation, open-label donepezil-treatment phase; (ii) a 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase; and (iii) a 12-week, single-blind (i.e. patient-blind) donepezil-treatment phase. Patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease received open-label treatment with donepezil (5 mg/day for 4 weeks, then 10 mg/day for the remainder of the phase) for 12-24 weeks. Patients who exhibited a decline or no change from baseline on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and whose physician was not sufficiently certain of clinical benefit to warrant continued treatment were randomised into the double-blind phase in which patients received 12 weeks of treatment with donepezil (10 mg/day) or placebo. At the end of the double-blind phase, donepezil-treated patients continued to receive donepezil, while placebo-treated patients were rechallenged with donepezil, in a 12-week single-blind phase. Patients were assessed at the start of the double-blind phase and at weeks 6 and 12 of this phase, and at the end of the single-blind phase.

resultsSix hundred and nineteen patients completed the open-label phase; 69% showed clear clinical benefit and 31% showed uncertain benefit. 202 patients were randomised to continued donepezil treatment (n = 99) or placebo (n = 103). Differences in favour of continued donepezil versus placebo were observed in cognition and behaviour. In addition, there was a non-significant trend favouring donepezil in activities of daily living (ADL) [week 12 observed case mean treatment differences: MMSE, 1.13 (p = 0.02); Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - cognitive subscale, 0.57 (p = 0.5); the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, -3.16 (p = 0.02); Disability Assessment for Dementia scale, 3.67 (p = 0.1)].

conclusionMost patients showed clear clinical benefit during initial donepezil treatment. Among patients for whom clinical benefit was uncertain, improvement in cognition and behaviour were observed for those who continued donepezil treatment compared with the group switched to placebo. Initial decline or stabilisation does not necessarily indicate a lack of efficacy in Alzheimer's disease, and the decision to discontinue treatment should be based on an evaluation of all domains (cognition, behaviour and ADL) and performed at several timepoints.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAnalysis of VarianceCognitionDisease ProgressionDonepezilDouble-Blind MethodDrug EvaluationFemaleHumansIndansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsDonepezilIndansNootropic AgentsPiperidines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.