Trial reportCNS drugs2006
Assessing therapeutic efficacy in a progressive disease: a study of donepezil in Alzheimer's disease.
Trial report in CNS drugs, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01772095 (A 6 Months, Prospective, Open-label, Observational, Non-interventional Clinical Trial to Examine the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 6 Months, Prospective, Open-label, Observational, Non-interventional Clinical Trial to Examine the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil (Dementis®) Administration in Patients With Dementia.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy of 5 and 10 mg donepezil in improving cognitive function in patients with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Withdrawal or continuation of cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine or both, in people with dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Different Doses of Pharmacological Treatments for Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- The effect of anti-dementia drugs on Alzheimer disease-induced cognitive impairment: A network meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for apathy in Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Reduced basal forebrain atrophy progression in a randomized Donepezil trial in prodromal Alzheimer's disease.Scientific reports · 2017Trial
- Are the effects of a non-drug multimodal activation therapy of dementia sustainable? Follow-up study 10 months after completion of a randomised controlled trial.BMC neurology · 2012Trial
- Targeting NLRP3 inflammasome for neurodegenerative disorders.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Review
- The synapse as a treatment avenue for Alzheimer's Disease.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Review
- The Dose and Duration-dependent Association between Melatonin Treatment and Overall Cognition in Alzheimer's Dementia: A Network Meta- Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.Current neuropharmacology · 2022Article
- Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil, Galantamine, Rivastigmine, and Memantine for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Nerve Growth Factor Pathobiology During the Progression of Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Review
- Alignment of European Regulatory and Health Technology Assessments: A Review of Licensed Products for Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Article
- Withdrawal of Antidementia Drugs in Older People: Who, When and How?Drugs & aging · 2016Review
- Use of functional imaging across clinical phases in CNS drug development.Translational psychiatry · 2013Article
- Application of Choynowski's Memory Scale in assessment of patients with dementia.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2012Article
- Recommended measures for the assessment of cognitive and physical performance in older patients with dementia: a systematic review.Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra · 2012Article
- The efficacy of licensed-indication use of donepezil and memantine monotherapies for treating behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in patients with Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra · 2011Article
- Have last-observation-carried-forward analyses caused us to favour more toxic dementia therapies over less toxic alternatives? A systematic review.Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the value of continued donepezil treatment in patients with Alzheimer's disease for whom clinical benefit was initially judged to be uncertain.
methodsThe study consisted of three phases: (i) a 12- to 24-week, pre-randomisation, open-label donepezil-treatment phase; (ii) a 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase; and (iii) a 12-week, single-blind (i.e. patient-blind) donepezil-treatment phase. Patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease received open-label treatment with donepezil (5 mg/day for 4 weeks, then 10 mg/day for the remainder of the phase) for 12-24 weeks. Patients who exhibited a decline or no change from baseline on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and whose physician was not sufficiently certain of clinical benefit to warrant continued treatment were randomised into the double-blind phase in which patients received 12 weeks of treatment with donepezil (10 mg/day) or placebo. At the end of the double-blind phase, donepezil-treated patients continued to receive donepezil, while placebo-treated patients were rechallenged with donepezil, in a 12-week single-blind phase. Patients were assessed at the start of the double-blind phase and at weeks 6 and 12 of this phase, and at the end of the single-blind phase.
resultsSix hundred and nineteen patients completed the open-label phase; 69% showed clear clinical benefit and 31% showed uncertain benefit. 202 patients were randomised to continued donepezil treatment (n = 99) or placebo (n = 103). Differences in favour of continued donepezil versus placebo were observed in cognition and behaviour. In addition, there was a non-significant trend favouring donepezil in activities of daily living (ADL) [week 12 observed case mean treatment differences: MMSE, 1.13 (p = 0.02); Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - cognitive subscale, 0.57 (p = 0.5); the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, -3.16 (p = 0.02); Disability Assessment for Dementia scale, 3.67 (p = 0.1)].
conclusionMost patients showed clear clinical benefit during initial donepezil treatment. Among patients for whom clinical benefit was uncertain, improvement in cognition and behaviour were observed for those who continued donepezil treatment compared with the group switched to placebo. Initial decline or stabilisation does not necessarily indicate a lack of efficacy in Alzheimer's disease, and the decision to discontinue treatment should be based on an evaluation of all domains (cognition, behaviour and ADL) and performed at several timepoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16599649What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.