Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2006
Trapidil is as effective as isosorbide-dinitrate for treating stable angina pectoris: a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, randomized study.
Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancements in pharmacotherapy for angina.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveNitrates have long been used in the treatment of stable angina pectoris. We set out to show that trapidil, a triazolo-pyrimidine with a mode of action different from that of nitrates, is not inferior to isosorbide-dinitrate (ISDN) in the treatment of this clinical syndrome. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe studied the efficacy of 200 mg trapidil (t.i.d.) vs. ISDN (20 mg b.i.d.) in patients with chronic stable angina treated for 12 weeks. The therapeutic effect was measured in terms of responder rate as change in total exercise time (TET) by at least 60 seconds using the bicycle ergometer test.
resultsA total of 648 patients were included in the study. Responder rates in the Per- Protocol (PP) population (n = 529) were 50.4% (n = 133) in the trapidil group and 52.5% (n = 139) in the ISDN group (p = 0.233). As the lower non-inferiority limit (-15%) was clearly excluded from the 95% CI (pp: -10.6%, +6.4%; ITT -9.7%, 5.7%), non-inferiority of trapidil compared to ISDN can be concluded. Trapidil 200 mg t.i.d. combined with short-acting NTG prn as rescue medication over 12 weeks in subjects with chronic stable angina pectoris proved to have similar effects on TET and on other clinical endpoints as ISDN 20 mg b.i.d. The secondary efficacy analyses did not reveal any clinically relevant differences between treatment groups, and were not in conflict with the non-inferiority claim. Patients in the ISDN group had significantly more headache (34.1%; n = 110) compared to those taking trapidil (19.3%, n = 62; p <0.0001).
conclusionsOverall results of this study show that both drugs are equally effective and safe for the short-term treatment of patients with chronic stable angina pectoris and that trapidil can be considered as therapeutically equivalent to ISDN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.