Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16598296›Full record

Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2006

A blinded, randomized, multicenter study of an intravenous Staphylococcus aureus immune globulin.

D K Benjamin, R Schelonka, R White, H P Holley, E Bifano, J Cummings, K Adcock, D Kaufman, B Puppala, P Riedel and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The evolving landscape ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Methicillin-resistantCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  8. The immune evasion roles ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Investigational agents for the treatment of methicillin-resistantExpert opinion on investigational drugs · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Infective endocarditis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

D K BenjaminDuke University Department of Pediatrics, Durham, NC 27710, USA. danny.benjamin@duke.edu
R Schelonka
R White
H P Holley
E Bifano
J Cummings
K Adcock
D Kaufman
B Puppala
P Riedel
B Hall
J White
C M Cotton
S. aureus prevention investigators
Duke University · USAdvocate Lutheran General Hospital · USClinical Research Institute · USEast Carolina University · USMemorial Hospital · USMemorial Hospital of South Bend · USSunrise Hospital & Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Mississippi · USUniversity of Virginia · USWilford Hall Medical Center · US

Funding

North Carolina Collaborative PPRU NetworkU10HD045962 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENJAMIN, DANIEL K. · 2004 to 2009
$2.1M
Early Diagnosis of Neonatal CandidiasisK23HD044799 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENJAMIN, DANIEL K. · 2005 to 2008
$610k
NICHD NIH HHS 1U10-HD45962-02NICHD NIH HHS HD044799-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesVery low birth weight (VLBW) infants are vulnerable to nosocomial infections and subsequent morbidity; including infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus: 85% of nosocomial S. aureus infections are caused by capsular polysaccharide (CPS) types 5 and 8. Altastaph is a polyclonal investigational human immunoglobulin G (IgG) with high levels of opsonizing S. aureus CPS types 5 and 8 IgG.

methodsA Phase 2 clinical trial to assess the safety and kinetics of Altastaph in VLBW infants. Neonates in this multicenter study were randomized to receive two identical 20 ml/kg i.v. infusions of either 0.45% NaCl placebo or 1000 mg Altastaph/kg. Each infant was followed for 28 days after the second infusion or until discharge. Serum S. aureus CPS types 5 and 8 IgG levels were measured preinfusion and at various times after each infusion.

resultsOf 206 neonates, 158 received both infusions. Adverse events were similar in the two treatment groups. Six subjects (3% in each group) discontinued owing to an adverse event. Geometric mean anti-type 5 IgG levels were 402 and 642 mcg/ml 1 day following infusion of the first (day 0) and Second (day 14) doses, respectively, in neonates < or =1000 g and slightly higher in neonates 1001 to 1500 g. Trough levels before second infusion were 188 mcg/ml. Type 8 IgG levels were similar. Geometric mean IgG levels among placebo recipients were consistently <2 and <5 mcg/ml for types 5 and 8 in both weight groups. Three episodes of S. aureus bacteremia occurred in each arm.

conclusionsInfusion of Altastaph in VLBW neonates resulted in high levels of specific S. aureus types 5 and 8 CPS IgG. The administration of this anti-staphylococcal hyperimmune globulin was well tolerated in this population.

Indexed as

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightBacterial CapsulesCross InfectionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunologic FactorsInfant, NewbornInjections, IntravenousIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMalePolysaccharides, BacterialStaphylococcal Infectionscapsular polysaccharide, type 5, Staphylococcus aureuscapsular polysaccharide, type 8, Staphylococcus aureusImmunoglobulin GImmunologic FactorsPolysaccharides, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID16598296
OpenAlexW2033429986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.