ArticleJournal of human hypertension2006
'Office-hour' ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is sufficient for blood pressure diagnosis.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy of Short-Term Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements for the Diagnosis of Hypertension.Cureus · 2021Article
- Article
- The Post Clinic Ambulatory Blood Pressure (PC-ABP) study correlates Post Clinic Blood Pressure (PCBP) with the gold standard Ambulatory Blood Pressure.BMC research notes · 2018Article
- A novel approach to office blood pressure measurement: 30-minute office blood pressure vs daytime ambulatory blood pressure.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We conducted this study to determine whether 'office hour', defined as time period from 0800 to 1800 hours, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) predicts daytime ('waking-hour') and 24-h ABPM results, and to examine the impact of sleep disturbance on ABPM and nocturnal dip. Eighty-four patients (mean age 49+/-18 years, 47 males) were studied. Systolic, diastolic and mean 4-, 6-, 8-, 'office-hour' as well as 'waking-hour' blood pressures (BPs) were obtained from 24-h ABPM readings. Of these, no statistical differences were found between 8-h and 'office-hour' systolic, diastolic and mean BPs compared to 'waking-hour' values. There was complete concordance between 'office-hour' and 'waking-hour' ABPM diagnosis based on British Hypertension Society definitions. Sleep disturbance was found in 22 patients (26%). Although nocturnal dip was not significantly different in either sleep-disturbed or non-disturbed patients, patients who reported sleep disturbance had significantly higher proportion of borderline/abnormal BP diagnosis compared to non-sleep-disturbed counterpart during both 'waking hour' and night time. In patients without sleep disturbance, there was complete concordance between 'office-hour', 'waking-hour' and 24-h ABPM diagnosis based on British Hypertension Society definitions. 'Office-hour' ABPM is predictive of 'waking-hour' and 24-h ambulatory BP readings. Sleep disturbance is common in patients undergoing the test, and significantly raises the BP readings. We therefore propose 'office-hour' ABPM as an accurate, reliable and comfortable method of continual non-invasive BP monitoring, and omitting routine night time BP monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16598289What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.