Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16597660›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2006

Effect of different forms of information produced for cancer patients on their use of the information, social support, and anxiety: randomised trial.

R B Jones, J Pearson, A J Cawsey, D Bental, A Barrett, J White, C A White, W H Gilmour

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00127465 (Investigating the Impact of Tailored Reports on Anxiety), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00127465 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Investigating the Impact of Tailored Reports on Anxiety

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PlymouthRan2001 to 2003Enrolled400ConditionsBreast Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Laryngeal Neoplasms, Cervix NeoplasmsArmsIssue of information booklet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for preparing patients for chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Utility of a Referral Letter to Improve Comprehensibility of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care: a Single-Center Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Trial
  6. Treatment summaries for head and neck cancer survivors: a pilot study to improving patient recall and survivorship care plans.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Patient Engagement: an Assessment of Canadian Radiotherapy Programs' Current Practices, Perceived Barriers, and Facilitators.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Communicating medication risk to cardiovascular patients in Qatar.International journal of health care quality assurance · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Social, psychological and existential well-being in patients with glioma and their caregivers: a qualitative study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2012
    Article
  17. The experience of symptoms and information needs of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2012
    Article
  18. Developing a conceptual map of patient information needs in prostate cancer screening.NI 2012 : 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23-27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. International Congress in Nursing Informatics (11th : 2012 : Montreal, Quebec) · 2012
    Article
  19. Use and evaluation of an individually tailored website for counselees prior to breast cancer genetic counseling.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2011
    Article
  20. The role of health kiosks in 2009: literature and informant review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

R B JonesFaculty of Health and Social Work, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA. ray.jones@plymouth.ac.uk
J Pearson
A J Cawsey
D Bental
A Barrett
J White
C A White
W H Gilmour

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the hypothesis that different methods of selecting and printing information for cancer patients could improve emotional support by affecting interaction with others, and so lead to improved psychological wellbeing.

designRandomised trial with eight groups (three factors, 2x2x2). Data collected at recruitment and three month follow-up.

participants400 patients starting radiotherapy, of whom 325 with breast or prostate cancer and complete anxiety and depression data were included in the analysis.

interventionsPrinted booklets: half had only general information from CancerBACUP about each patient's cancer and half had personalised information from the patient's medical record plus selected general information; half were composed of information chosen interactively by the patient and half were produced automatically with a larger volume of material; and half had additional advice on anxiety management and half did not.

main outcome measuresPatients' views of the information, use of their booklets with others; change in reported social support; change in anxiety and depression.

resultsThe larger booklets produced automatically were more likely to be found useful and to tell patients something new and less likely to be seen as too limited than the booklets produced interactively, but they were also more likely to overwhelm some patients. Personalised booklets were more likely than general booklets to tell patients something new. There was no difference in patients' perceived understanding of their cancer by any of the intervention factors. Patients with personalised information were more likely to show their booklets to others and to think it helped in discussing their cancer or its treatment. There were no major differences in social support, anxiety, or depression by any intervention factors.

conclusionsPatients were more likely to show personalised information to their confidants than general information. Further research is needed into the effects of sharing information on patients' social support and anxiety. Trial registration US Government Clinical Trials Database NCT00127465.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPamphletsPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionPerceptionSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID16597660
PMCPMC1444811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.