Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16597178›Full record

ReviewPLoS medicine2006

The latest mania: selling bipolar disorder.

David Healy

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Bipolar II Disorder Is a Myth.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Towards a genealogy of pharmacological practice.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The dominance of big pharma: power.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Pediatric bipolar disorder in an era of "mindless psychiatry".Journal of trauma & dissociation : the official journal of the International Society for the Study of Dissociation (ISSD) · 2012
    Review
  14. Review
  15. The bipolar spectrum: myth or reality?Current psychiatry reports · 2010
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Controversies concerning the diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder in children.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The assessment of children and adolescents with bipolar disorder.Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America · 2009
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David HealyNorth Wales Department of Psychological Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom. healy_hergest@compuserve.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AdvertisingDrug IndustryAdolescentAdultAffectAnticonvulsantsAntipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderChildChild, PreschoolHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsSuicideAnticonvulsantsAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID16597178
PMCPMC1434505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.