Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16597161›Full record

ReviewDrugs2006

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease: association with induction therapy?

Vikas R Dharnidharka

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vikas R DharnidharkaUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0296, USA. vikasmd@peds.ufl.edu

Funding

Pediatric Transplant Infections and OutcomesR21DK069535 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DHARNIDHARKA, VIKAS R. · 2005 to 2006
$251k
NIDDK NIH HHS 1R21DK069535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last 2 decades, several polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies have been developed for induction therapy in the early post solid-organ transplantation period. The use of these antibodies has been associated, for the most part, with a decrease in early acute rejection rates. However, there has been a simultaneous rise in infectious complications, particularly in the incidence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). Determinations of adjusted odds ratios or relative risk have yielded conflicting information regarding whether these antibody agents increase the risk for PTLD. In order to interpret the results of the different studies, the reader requires a detailed knowledge of the types of analyses performed and the characteristics of the populations studied. This article analyses the available data on PTLD risk after the use of induction antibody agents. While some studies suggest an increased risk of PTLD after induction antibody use, other studies do not; the available data are not conclusive either way at this time.

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationAntibodies, MonoclonalClinical Trials as TopicGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppression TherapyLymphoproliferative DisordersPostoperative ComplicationsAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.