Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16596359›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2006

Age at introduction of new foods and advanced beta cell autoimmunity in young children with HLA-conferred susceptibility to type 1 diabetes.

S M Virtanen, M G Kenward, M Erkkola, S Kautiainen, C Kronberg-Kippilä, T Hakulinen, S Ahonen, L Uusitalo, S Niinistö, R Veijola and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

S M VirtanenDepartment of Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention, National Public Health Institute, Mannerheimintie 166, 00300, Helsinki, Finland. suvi.virtanen@ktl.fi
M G Kenward
M Erkkola
S Kautiainen
C Kronberg-Kippilä
T Hakulinen
S Ahonen
L Uusitalo
S Niinistö
R Veijola
O Simell
J Ilonen
M Knip
Tampere University · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIDiabetes Tutkimussaatio · FIFinnish Cancer Registry · FILondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBTampere University · FITampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Oulu · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisEvidence for the role of infant feeding in the development of beta cell autoimmunity is inconsistent. We set out to study the effects of breastfeeding and of age at introduction of supplementary foods on the development of beta cell autoimmunity. SUBJECTS AND

methodsA prospective birth cohort of 3,565 infants with HLA-DQB1-conferred susceptibility to type 1 diabetes was recruited between 1996 and 2001 from two university hospital areas in Finland. Blood samples were collected at 3- to 12-month intervals to measure antibodies against islet cells, insulin, glutamate dehydroxylase and islet antigen 2. The families kept a record on the age at introduction of new foods, and for each visit completed a structured dietary questionnaire. The endpoint was repeated positivity for islet cell antibodies together with at least one of the other three antibodies.

resultsThe overall or exclusive duration of breastfeeding was not associated with the risk of developing the endpoint. An early age at introduction of fruits and berries (< or =4 months) was related to increased risk of developing positivity for the endpoint (hazard ratio [95% CI] for earliest tertile 2.02 [1.03-3.95] and for midtertile 1.97 [1.06-3.64] compared with latest tertile >4 months). Also, introducing roots between 3 and 3.9 months (midtertile) was related to increased risk of the endpoint (hazard ratio [95% CI] for the earliest tertile 1.04 [0.57-1.90] and for midtertile 1.82 [1.19-2.79] compared with latest tertile). These associations were independent of several putative socio-demographic and perinatal confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationOur findings suggest that an early age at introduction of fruits and berries and roots associates independently with beta cell autoimmunity, contradicting earlier findings from smaller birth cohort studies.

Indexed as

AutoimmunityInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAge FactorsBreast FeedingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diet SurveysDisease ProgressionFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHLA-DQ AntigensHLA-DQ beta-ChainsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInsulin-Secreting CellsMaleHLA-DQ AntigensHLA-DQB1 antigenHLA-DQ beta-Chains

Identifiers

PMID16596359
OpenAlexW1985634062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.