Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16586084›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2006

Mechanical reconfiguration mediates swallowing and rejection in Aplysia californica.

Valerie A Novakovic, Gregory P Sutton, David M Neustadter, Randall D Beer, Hillel J Chiel

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Soft-surface grasping: radular opening inThe Journal of experimental biology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neuromechanical simulation.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2010
    Article
  15. The brain in its body: motor control and sensing in a biomechanical context.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2009
    Review
  16. Neuromechanics of multifunctionality during rejection in Aplysia californica.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valerie A NovakovicDepartment of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, 2080 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Gregory P Sutton
David M Neustadter
Randall D Beer
Hillel J Chiel

Funding

Neuromechanics of Multifunctionality in AplysiaR01NS047073 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CHIEL, HILLEL J · 2005 to 2008
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS NS-047073NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscular hydrostats, such as tongues, trunks or tentacles, have fewer constraints on their degrees of freedom than musculoskeletal systems, so changes in a structure's shape may alter the positions and lengths of other components (i.e., induce mechanical reconfiguration). We studied mechanical reconfiguration during rejection and swallowing in the marine mollusk Aplysia californica. During rejection, inedible material is pushed out of an animal's buccal cavity. The grasper (radula/odontophore) closes on inedible material, and then a posterior muscle, I2, pushes the grasper toward the jaws (protracts it). After the material is released, an anterior muscle complex (the I1/I3/jaw complex) pushes the grasper toward the esophagus (retracts it). During swallowing, the grasper is protracted open, and then retracts closed, pulling in food. Grasper closure changes its shape. Magnetic resonance images show that grasper closure lengthens I2. A kinetic model quantified the changes in the ability of I2 and I1/I3 to exert force as grasper shape changed. Grasper closure increases I2's ability to protract during rejection, and increases I1/I3's ability to retract during swallowing. Motor neurons controlling radular closure may therefore affect the behavioral outputs of I2's and I1/I3's motor neurons. Thus, motor neurons may modulate the outputs of other motor neurons through mechanical reconfiguration.

Indexed as

AnimalsAplysiaBehavior, AnimalBiomechanical PhenomenaDeglutitionElectromyographyFeeding BehaviorJawMagnetic Resonance ImagingMouthMuscles

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.