Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16585749›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2006

Comparison of OG1RF and an isogenic fsrB deletion mutant by transcriptional analysis: the Fsr system of Enterococcus faecalis is more than the activator of gelatinase and serine protease.

Agathe Bourgogne, Susan G Hilsenbeck, Gary M Dunny, Barbara E Murray

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Metabolic cross-talk promotes persistence ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Insights into ecology, pathogenesis, and biofilm formation ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. c-di-AMP Is Essential for the Virulence ofInfection and immunity · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agathe BourgogneDivision of Infectious Disease, Center for the Study of Emerging and Re-emerging Pathogens, MSB 2.112, University of Texas Medical School, 6431 Fannin St., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Susan G Hilsenbeck
Gary M Dunny
Barbara E Murray
Baylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES FOR E FAECALIS INFECTIONSR37AI047923 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MURRAY, BARBARA E · 2000 to 2009
$4.0M
Alternative Approaches for E. faecalis InfectionsR01AI047923 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MURRAY, BARBARA E · 2010 to 2014
$3.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI047923NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI 47923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The FsrABC system of Enterococcus faecalis controls the expression of gelatinase and a serine protease via a quorum-sensing mechanism, and recent studies suggest that the Fsr system may also regulate other genes important for virulence. To investigate the possibility that Fsr influences the expression of additional genes, we used transcriptional profiling, with microarrays based on the E. faecalis strain V583 sequence, to compare the E. faecalis strain OG1RF with its isogenic mutant, TX5266, an fsrB deletion mutant. We found that the presence of an intact fsrB influences expression of numerous genes throughout the growth phases tested, namely, late log to early stationary phase. In addition, the Fsr regulon is independent of the activity of the proteases, GelE and SprE, whose expression was confirmed to be activated at all three time points tested. While expression of some genes (i.e., ef1097 and ef0750 to -757, encoding hypothetical proteins) was activated in late log phase in OG1RF versus the fsrB deletion mutant, expression of ef1617 to -1634 (eut-pdu orthologues) was highly repressed by the presence of an intact Fsr at entry into stationary phase. This is the first time that Fsr has been characterized as a negative regulator. The newly recognized Fsr-regulated targets include other factors, besides gelatinase, described as important for biofilms (BopD), and genes predicted to encode the surface proteins EF0750 to -0757 and EF1097, along with proteins implicated in several metabolic pathways, indicating that the FsrABC system may be an important regulator in strain OG1RF, with both positive and negative effects.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsEnterococcus faecalisGene DeletionGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, RegulatorMembrane ProteinsMetabolismReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, BacterialRNA, MessengerAgrCfs protein, Enterococcus faecalisBacterial ProteinsFsrA protein, Enterococcus faecalisFsrB protein, EnterococcusMembrane ProteinsRNA, BacterialRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID16585749
PMCPMC1446981
OpenAlexW2015816941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.