Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16584557›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2006

Linking community pharmacy dispensing data to prescribing data of general practitioners.

Stefan R Florentinus, Patrick C Souverein, Fabiënne A M G Griens, Peter P Groenewegen, Hubert G M Leufkens, Eibert R Heerdink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Community pharmacy: an untapped patient data resource.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Initiation of antidepressant therapy: do patients follow the GP's prescription?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefan R FlorentinusDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands. s.r.florentinus@pharm.uu.nl
Patrick C Souverein
Fabiënne A M G Griens
Peter P Groenewegen
Hubert G M Leufkens
Eibert R Heerdink

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDatabases are frequently used for pharmacoepidemiological research. However, most of these databases consist either of prescribing, dispensing or administrative data and therefore lack insight in the interaction between the several health professionals around the patient.

methodsTo determine the success rate of linking records from the dispensing database of the Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics to the prescribing database of the second Dutch national survey of general practice, conducted by NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), a deterministic record linkage approach was used with patient and prescription characteristics as matching variables between the two databases.

resultsThe catchment area included 123 community pharmacies, 90 GP practices and approximately 170,000 unique patients. Overall 110,102 (64.8%) unique patients were linked using the matching variables patient's gender, year of birth, the 4-digit part of the postal code, date of dispensing/prescribing and ATC-code. The final database contains of the 110,102 both prescribing data from 83 GP practices and dispensing data of 112 community pharmacies.

conclusionThis study shows that linkage of dispensing to prescribing data is feasible with a combination of patient characteristics, such as gender, year of birth and postal code, and prescription characteristics like prescription date and ATC-code. We obtained a linkage proportion of 64.8% resulting in complete prescribing and dispensing history of 110,102 patients. This offers an opportunity to gain insight in the mechanisms and factors influencing drug utilisation in general practice.

Indexed as

AdultCatchment Area, HealthDatabases, FactualDrug PrescriptionsDrug Utilization ReviewFamily PracticeFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMedical Record LinkageMiddle AgedNetherlandsPharmaciesPostal ServicePractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID16584557
PMCPMC1450270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.