Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16584456›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2006

Prescription drug expenditures and population demographics.

Steven G Morgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Estimated cost of universal public coverage of prescription drugs in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven G MorganCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z3.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide detailed demographic profiles of prescription drug utilization and expenditures in order to isolate the impact of demographic change from other factors that affect drug expenditure trends. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingDemographic information and drug utilization data were extracted for virtually the entire British Columbia (BC) population of 1996 and 2002. All residents had public medical and hospital insurance; however their drug coverage resembled the mix of private and public insurance in the United States. STUDY

designA series of research variables were constructed to illustrate profiles of drug expenditures and drug utilization across 96 age/sex strata. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsDrug use and expenditure information was extracted from the BC PharmaNet, a computer network connecting all pharmacies in the province. PRINCIPAL

findingsPer capita drug expenditures increased at an average annual rate of 10.8 percent between 1996 and 2002. Population aging explained 1.0 points of this annual rate of expenditure growth; the balance was attributable to rising age/sex-specific drug expenditures.

conclusionsRelatively little of the observed increase in drug expenditures in BC could be attributed to demographic change. Most of the expenditure increase stemmed from the age/sex-specific quantity and type of drugs purchased. The sustainability of drug spending therefore depends not on outside forces but on decisions made by policy makers, prescribers, and patients.

Indexed as

DemographyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDrug UtilizationFees, PharmaceuticalFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID16584456
PMCPMC1702520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.