ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2006
Manometric study in ulcerative colitis patients with modified ileal pouch--anal anastomosis.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- When Not to Pouch: Important Considerations for Patient Selection for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsSphincter-saving operations and construction of intestinal reservoirs aim at additional improvement quality of life of patients with restorative proctocolectomy. The conventional ileoanal anastomosis affects the function of the anal sphincters. There is a need for operative techniques that provide sufficient intraluminal anal pressure and thus a better postoperative continence and quality of life. MATERIALS AND
methodsIleal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) after restorative proctocolectomy was carried out in 42 consecutive ulcerative colitis patients (age range: 19-55 years and mean age of 35.52 years). There were 17 males (40.48%) and 25 females (59.52%). IPAA was performed at dentate line, according to a standard method, in 20 patients (47.62% of the cases; mean age of 35.20 years), 19 of which were in 1986-1995 and one patient in 1998. In 1996-2002, however, IPAA was performed after plicating the demucosed segment of rectal residual in 22 patients (52.38% of the cases; mean age of 35.82 years). This modification consisted in strengthening the internal anal sphincter by creation of a smooth muscle cuff through plication of a mucosectomized segment of rectal residual. The basal anal-canal and squeeze pressures were recorded prior to the operation as well as 1 month afterwards and then every 6 months for 2 years. Kelly-Hohlschneider's continence scores after Herold's modification were applied in 14 consecutive patients.
resultsThanks to strengthening the internal anal sphincter by this segment, the basal pressure increased from a preoperative value of 68+/-6 mmHg up to 80+/-6 mmHg at the end of the second postoperative year (P<0.001). This favourable effect could be explained with the additional contractile potential of the plicated rectal segment resulting from the interference of the contractile potential of the internal anal sphincter with that of the smooth muscle cuff.
conclusionThe modified IPAA creates a novel and probably functionally active anatomical substrate. The basal anal-canal pressure is maintained sufficiently high through the tone of the smooth muscle cuff and internal anal sphincter. Our preliminary results suggest that the presented technique for performing IPAA may contribute to better functional results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.