Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16583143›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry2006

Novel mutations that enhance or repress the aggregation potential of SOD1.

Uma Krishnan, Marjatta Son, Bhagya Rajendran, Jeffrey L Elliott

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Uma KrishnanDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, Texas, 75390, USA.
Marjatta Son
Bhagya Rajendran
Jeffrey L Elliott

Funding

Neuronal-glial interaction in the pathogenesis of ALSR01NS040911 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI ELLIOTT, JEFFREY L · 2001 to 2004
$1.1M
NINDS NIH HHS NS40911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in SOD1 cause FALS by a gain of function likely related to protein misfolding and aggregation. SOD1 mutations encompass virtually every domain of the molecule, making it difficult to identify motifs important in SOD1 aggregation. Zinc binding to SOD1 is important for structural integrity, and is hypothesized to play a role in mutant SOD1 aggregation. To address this question, we mutated the unique zinc binding sites of SOD1 and examined whether these changes would influence SOD1 aggregation. We generated single and multiple mutations in SOD1 zinc binding residues (H71, H80 and D83) either alone or in combination with an aggregate forming mutation (A4V) known to cause disease. These SOD1 mutants were assayed for their ability to form aggregates. Using an in vitro cellular SOD1 aggregation assay, we show that combining A4V with mutations in non-zinc binding domains (G37R or G85R) increases SOD1 aggregation potential. Mutations at two zinc binding residues (H71G and D83G) also increase SOD1 aggregation potential. However, an H80G mutation at the third zinc binding residue decreases SOD1 aggregation potential even in the context of other aggregate forming SOD1 mutations. These results demonstrate that various mutations have different effects on SOD1 aggregation potential and that the H80G mutation appears to uniquely act as a dominant inhibitor of SOD1 aggregation.

Indexed as

MutationAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisAnimalsBinding SitesCell LineDimerizationHumansSuperoxide DismutaseSuperoxide Dismutase-1TransfectionZincSOD1 protein, humanSuperoxide DismutaseSuperoxide Dismutase-1Zinc

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.