ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2006
Genomic screening of head and neck cancer and its implications for therapy planning.
Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Molecular characterization of head and neck cancer: how close to personalized targeted therapy?Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2012Article
- Malignant and nonmalignant gene signatures in squamous head and neck cancer.Journal of oncology · 2012Article
- Clinicopathological and prognostic implications of genetic alterations in oral cancers.Oncology letters · 2011Article
- Genomic profiling of advanced-stage oral cancers reveals chromosome 11q alterations as markers of poor clinical outcome.PloS one · 2011Article
- Article
- Current potential and limitations of molecular diagnostic methods in head and neck cancer.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2010Review
- Metal-proteinase ADAM12, kinesin 14 and checkpoint suppressor 1 as new molecular markers of laryngeal carcinoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2009Article
- DNA copy number variation and loss of heterozygosity in relation to recurrence of and survival from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a review.Head & neck · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite great technical improvements in radiotherapy and surgery, survival for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has still not improved significantly over the last decades. Management of SCCHN has mainly been based on the TNM staging and site over this time period, even though we know that there are individual differences independent of the TNM status. Individual patients with small tumors might have a poor outcome, and patients with large tumors may end up with a favorable prognosis, despite their respective TNM classification. Recent molecular studies indicate that underlying genetic abnormalities may reflect such individual differences independently of TNM status. Individualization of treatment based on such biological properties of the tumors might result in less over as well as under treatment. However, the optimal panel of biomarkers to be used for the individualization of treatment is yet to be defined. A variety of laboratory techniques have been used in studies that investigate the individual biological features, spanning from methods that screen the genome for chromosomal and genetic abnormalities, e.g., cytogenetics, CGH, SKY and cDNA micro array, to detailed studies of specific aberrations. The purpose of this review of the literature is to summarize what has been studied so far by methods for genetic screening and to relate these results to the prediction of the clinical outcome. We conclude that it is time to focus future prospective studies on how treatment can be individualized based on biomarkers in combination with the macroscopic features of SCCHN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16575584What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.