Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16575498›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2006

Pharmacokinetic consequences of active drug efflux at the blood-brain barrier.

Stina Syvänen, Rujia Xie, Selma Sahin, Margareta Hammarlund-Udenaes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Modeling the Effect of Binding Kinetics in Spatial Drug Distribution in the Brain.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. P-glycoprotein deficient mouse in situ blood-brain barrier permeability and its prediction using an in combo PAMPA model.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2009
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Tariquidar-induced P-glycoprotein inhibition at the rat blood-brain barrier studied with (R)-11C-verapamil and PET.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2008
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Stina SyvänenDivision of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Therapy, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Box 591, 751 24, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rujia Xie
Selma Sahin
Margareta Hammarlund-Udenaes
Uppsala University · SEPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this simulation study was to investigate how the nature, location, and capacity of the efflux processes in relation to the permeability properties influence brain concentrations.

methodsReduced brain concentrations can be due to either influx hindrance, a gatekeeper function in the luminal membrane, which has been suggested for ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein), or efflux enhancement by transporters that pick up molecules on one side of the luminal or abluminal membrane and release them on the other side. Pharmacokinetic models including passive transport, influx hindrance, and efflux enhancement were built using the computer program MATLAB. The simulations were based on experimentally obtained parameters for morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, morphine-6-glucuronide, and gabapentin.

resultsThe influx hindrance process is the more effective for keeping brain concentrations low. Efflux enhancement decreases the half-life of the drug in the brain, whereas with influx hindrance the half-life is similar to that seen with passive transport. The relationship between the influx and efflux of the drug across the blood-brain barrier determines the steady-state ratio of brain to plasma concentrations of unbound drug, K(p,uu).

conclusionsBoth poorly and highly permeable drugs can reach the same steady-state ratio, although the time to reach steady state will differ. The volume of distribution of unbound drug in the brain does not influence K(p,uu), but does influence the total brain-to-blood ratio K(p) and the time to reach steady state in the brain.

Indexed as

PharmacokineticsAlgorithmsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Blood-Brain BarrierCarrier ProteinsChemical PhenomenaChemistry, PhysicalComputer SimulationDiffusionEndothelium, VascularHalf-LifeModels, StatisticalPharmaceutical PreparationsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Carrier ProteinsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID16575498
OpenAlexW2004030603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.