SynthesisJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN2006
Efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder compared with conventional selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine XR: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 50 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 218 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and tolerability of vilazodone for major depressive disorder: evidence from phase III/IV randomized controlled trials.Drug design, development and therapy · 2016Pooled it
- Evidence-based, pharmacological treatment guideline for depression in Korea, revised edition.Journal of Korean medical science · 2014Guideline
- Is escitalopram really relevantly superior to citalopram in treatment of major depressive disorder? A meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized trials.Croatian medical journal · 2010Pooled it
- Re-evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine vs SSRI: meta-analysis.Psychopharmacology · 2008Pooled it
- An evaluation of the cardiovascular safety profile of duloxetine: findings from 42 placebo-controlled studies.Drug safety · 2007Pooled it
- Personality change in a trial of psilocybin therapy v. escitalopram treatment for depression.Psychological medicine · 2024Trial
- Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study of the phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitor cilostazol as an adjunctive to antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2021Trial
- An Open-Label Pilot Study of Combined Augmentation With Creatine Monohydrate and 5-Hydroxytryptophan for Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor- or Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor-Resistant Depression in Adult Women.Journal of clinical psychopharmacology · 2017Trial
- Efficacy and safety of escitalopram in treatment of severe depression in Chinese population.Metabolic brain disease · 2017Trial
- MicroRNAs 146a/b-5 and 425-3p and 24-3p are markers of antidepressant response and regulate MAPK/Wnt-system genes.Nature communications · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Early non-response in patients with severe depression: escitalopram up-titration versus switch to duloxetine.Clinical drug investigation · 2012Trial
- Efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose study.Psychopharmacology · 2011Trial
- Trial
- Comparative Efficacy of Animal Depression Models and Antidepressant Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Modulation of serotonin transporter expression by escitalopram under inflammation.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Effects of Escitalopram on the Functional Neural Circuits in an Animal Model of Adolescent Depression.Molecular imaging and biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Effects of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 gene variants on escitalopram and aripiprazole treatment outcome and serum levels: results from the CAN-BIND 1 study.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Pretreatment anxious depression as a predictor of side effect frequency and severity in escitalopram and aripiprazole adjunctive therapy.Brain and behavior · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEscitalopram is the most selective of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants. Previous studies have suggested that escitalopram is superior to citalopram in efficacy. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies in which escitalopram was compared with other antidepressants to assess the relative efficacy of these agents.
methodsData from all randomized, double-blind studies in major depression in which escitalopram was compared with active controls (citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline and venlafaxine XR [extended release]) were pooled. The 10 studies were conducted in both specialist settings and general practice. Patients met the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV), for major depressive disorder and were at least 18 years old. In all but 2 studies, patients were required to have a score of 22 or more on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The primary outcome measure was the estimated difference in treatment effect in MADRS total score at the end of the study. Secondary outcome measures were the response to treatment (defined as a > or = 50% reduction in baseline MADRS total score) and remission rate (defined as MADRS total score < or = 12 at end of study).
resultsA total of 2687 patients were included in the analyses (escitalopram n = 1345, conventional SSRIs n = 1102, venlafaxine XR n = 240). Escitalopram was superior to all comparators in overall treatment effect, with an estimated difference in treatment effect of 1.07 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-1.73, p < 0.01), and in response (odds ratio [OR] 1.29, 95% CI 1.07-1.56, p < 0.01) and remission (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.46, p < 0.05) rates. In analysis by medication class, escitalopram was significantly superior to the SSRIs and comparable to venlafaxine, although the overall results do not necessarily reflect a significant difference between escitalopram and individual SSRIs. These results were similar in the severely depressed population (patients with baseline MADRS > or = 30). The withdrawal rate due to adverse events was 6.7% for escitalopram compared with 9.1% for the comparators (p < 0.05).
conclusionsIn this meta-analysis, escitalopram showed significant superiority in efficacy compared with the active controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16575428PMC1413963W108869947What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.