Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16573357›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2006

The impact of exercise training intensity on change in physiological function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Scott J Butcher, Richard L Jones

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Intensity of physical exercise and its effect on functional capacity in COPD: systematic review and meta-analysis.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Effects of exercise training on exercise capacity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving targeted therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Scott J ButcherDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Richard L Jones

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation incorporating exercise training is an effective method of enhancing physiological function and quality of life for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite the traditional belief that exercise is primarily limited by the inability to adequately increase ventilation to meet increased metabolic demands in these patients, significant deficiencies in muscle function, oxygen delivery and cardiac function are observed that contribute to exercise limitation. Because of this multifactorial exercise limitation, defining appropriate exercise training intensities is difficult. The lack of a pure cardiovascular limitation to exercise prohibits the use of training guidelines that are based on cardiovascular factors such as oxygen consumption or heart rate. Current recommendations for exercise training intensity for patients with COPD include exercising at a 'maximally tolerable level', at an intensity corresponding with 50% of peak oxygen consumption (V-O2peak), or at 60-80% of peak power output obtained on a symptom-limited exercise tolerance test. In general, it appears that higher intensity training elicits greater physiological change than lower intensity training; however, there is no consensus as to the exercise training intensity that elicits the greatest physiological benefit while remaining tolerable to patients. The 'optimal' intensity of training likely depends upon the individual goals of each patient. If the goal is to increase the ability to sustain tasks that are currently able to be performed, lower to moderate-intensity training is likely to be sufficient. If the goal of training, however, is to increase the ability to perform tasks that are above the current level of tolerance, higher intensity training is likely to elicit greater performance increases. In order to perform higher intensity exercise, an interval training model is likely required. High-intensity interval training involves significant anaerobic energy utilisation and, therefore, may better mimic the physiological requirements of activities of daily living. Also, high-intensity interval training is tolerable to patients and may, in fact, reduce the degree of dyspnoea and dynamic hyperinflation through a reduced ventilatory demand. Another factor that will determine the optimal intensity of training is the relative contribution of ventilatory limitation to exercise tolerance. If peak exercise tolerance is limited by a patient's ability to increase ventilation, it is possible that interval training at an intensity higher than peak will elicit greater muscular adaptation than an intensity at or below peak power on an incremental exercise test. More research is required to determine the optimal training intensity for pulmonary rehabilitation patients.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyExercise ToleranceHumansMuscle, SkeletalOxygen ConsumptionPhysical FitnessPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.