Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16572564›Full record

ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2006

Construct validity and dimensional structure of the ASIA motor scale.

Daniel E Graves, Ronald G Frankiewicz, William H Donovan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. En-bloc spondylectomy at the thoracolumbar junction for primary and metastatic spinal tumors: indications, outcomes and complications in a consecutive series of 22 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Long-term follow-up of non‑neurologic and neurologic complications after complex adult spinal deformity surgery: results from the Scoli-RISK-1 study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Scoli-RISK 1 results of lower extremity motor function 5 years after complex adult spinal deformity surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. En bloc resection in patients younger than 16 years affected by primary spine tumors: indications, results and complications in a series of 22 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Review
  19. En bloc spondylectomy in patients older than 60 years: indications, results and complications in a series of 37 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel E GravesBaylor College of Medicine, 1333 Moursund, A-222, Houston, TX 77030, USA. dgraves@bcm.tmc.edu
Ronald G Frankiewicz
William H Donovan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveThe use of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score as an outcome measure requires metrological study. This paper tests the hypothesis that a more accurate representation of motor function is obtained using separate upper and lower extremity scales rather than combining all 20 key muscle ratings into a single ASIA motor score.

methodsWe analyzed archived data from 6116 ASIA motor scale records extracted from the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center Database.

resultsThe hypothesis that separate scales more accurately represent motor function than a single motor scale was supported (chi2(difference) = 2596; df=1; P < 0.0001). Two scales account for 87% of the variance, whereas a single scale accounts for only 82%. Lower extremity function is well represented in both solutions; however, upper extremity function is accurately represented only with the use of 2 separate scales.

conclusionsThe use of components of the ASIA standards for other than classification of spinal cord injury needs study. Several lines of study converge to provide strong support for the existence of 2 distinctive dimensions underlying the ASIA motor scale. The use of a single motor score in spinal cord injury research should be questioned and justified to the extent possible. The use of upper and lower extremity scales will lead to a reduction in measurement error when the motor score is used as an outcome measure. The confirmation of 2 separate dimensions underlying the ASIA motor score will enable more accurate representation of motor function in spinal cord injury research.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceArmFemaleHumansLegMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalNeurologic ExaminationParaplegiaReproducibility of ResultsSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID16572564
PMCPMC1864793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.