ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2006
Teaching molecular genetics: Chapter 3--Proteomics in nephrology.
Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Teaching molecular genetics: chapter 4-positional cloning of genetic disorders.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2007Article
- Teaching articles: a new goal of the journal.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The novel discipline of proteomics has experienced a rapid growth in the recent past and has great potentials for the future. The study of proteins on a genomic scale enables a large number of proteins to be analysed simultaneously. Moreover, proteomic analysis reveals the presence of protein isoforms and post-translational modifications, both of which have the potential to regulate protein complex formation, activity and function. As such, the assessment of the proteome, unlike genomic analysis, provides a view of biological processes at their level of occurrence. The knowledge thus gained is important not only for a better understanding of renal physiology and pathophysiology, but also for the identification of disease markers and the development of new therapies. This review applies the science of proteomics to nephrology: our aim is to give an overview of the discipline, providing background information and outlining the scope, advantages and limitations of proteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.