ArticleJournal of human hypertension2006
Management in general practice of hypertensive patients poorly controlled with a fixed-dose renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and diuretic combination: results from a French national survey.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antihypertensive drugs in combination: additive or greater than additive?Journal of human hypertension · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High rates of uncontrolled hypertensives have been reported in France as well as in other countries, partly owing to an inadequate management of hypertension by clinicians. The objectives of the study were (1) to describe the therapeutic decisions faced by general practitioners (GP) in hypertensives not controlled by fixed-dose combination antihypertensive therapy with a renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor and a diuretic (D) and (2) to evaluate the frequency with which ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is used in these patients. Each GP had to include five uncontrolled hypertensives on fixed-dose RAS inhibitor and D combination. A total of 2118 GPs included 9551 patients; 8643 patients were receiving at least one of the two drugs at a low dose (group 1) and the remaining 908 patients were receiving high doses of both drugs (group 2). The most common therapeutic choice was that of a new combination, either a fixed-dose in one pill or with separate preparations: 65% (n=5621) in group 1 and 56% (n=505) in group 2. An increase in dose was chosen in 28% of patients in group 1 (n=2467) and continuation of treatment without modification in 27% of patients in group 2 (n=242). A third active principle was only added in 2.5% of patients in group 1 (n=219) and 11% in group 2 (n=103). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was employed in 25% of patients (n=2413). An improvement in hypertension management should be expected from the implementation of the 2005 French guidelines. Journal of Human Hypertension (2006) 20, 407-418. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1002000; published online 30 March 2006.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16572194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.