Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16571813›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2006

Analysis of rubella virus capsid protein-mediated enhancement of replicon replication and mutant rescue.

Wen-Pin Tzeng, Jason D Matthews, Teryl K Frey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Enhancement of protein expression by alphavirus replicons by designing self-replicating subgenomic RNAs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wen-Pin TzengDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, 24 Peachtree Center Ave., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, USA.
Jason D Matthews
Teryl K Frey
Georgia State University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF RUBELLA VIRUSR01AI021389 · NIAID · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FREY, TERYL K · 1987 to 2006
$1.7M
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF RUBELLA VIRUSR23AI021389 · NIAID · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FREY, TERYL K · 1985 to 1986
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI-21389NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI021389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rubella virus capsid protein (C) has been shown to complement a lethal deletion (termed deltaNotI) in P150 replicase protein. To investigate this phenomenon, we generated two lines of Vero cells that stably expressed either C (C-Vero cells) or C lacking the eight N-terminal residues (Cdelta8-Vero cells), a construct previously shown to be unable to complement DeltaNotI. In C-Vero cells but not Vero or Cdelta8-Vero cells, replication of a wild-type (wt) replicon expressing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene (RUBrep/GFP) was enhanced, and replication of a replicon with deltaNotI (RUBrep/GFP-deltaNotI) was rescued. Surprisingly, replicons with deleterious mutations in the 5' and 3' cis-acting elements were also rescued in C-Vero cells. Interestingly, the Cdelta8 construct localized to the nucleus while the C construct localized in the cytoplasm, explaining the lack of enhancement and rescue in Cdelta8-Vero cells since rubella virus replication occurs in the cytoplasm. Enhancement and rescue in C-Vero cells were at a basic step in the replication cycle, resulting in a substantial increase in the accumulation of replicon-specific RNAs. There was no difference in translation of the nonstructural proteins in C-Vero and Vero cells transfected with the wt and mutant replicons, demonstrating that enhancement and rescue were not due to an increase in the efficiency of translation of the transfected replicon transcripts. In replicon-transfected C-Vero cells, C and the P150 replicase protein associated by coimmunoprecipitation, suggesting that C might play a role in RNA replication, which could explain the enhancement and rescue phenomena. A unifying model that accounts for enhancement of wt replicon replication and rescue of diverse mutations by the rubella virus C protein is proposed.

Indexed as

Replicon5' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsCapsid ProteinsChlorocebus aethiopsMutationProtein BiosynthesisRNA, ViralRubella virusVero Cells5' Untranslated RegionsCapsid ProteinsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID16571813
PMCPMC1440428
OpenAlexW2157963163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.