Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16569258›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2006

Anopheles gambiae genome reannotation through synthesis of ab initio and comparative gene prediction algorithms.

Jun Li, Michelle M Riehle, Yan Zhang, Jiannong Xu, Frederick Oduol, Shawn M Gomez, Karin Eiglmeier, Beatrix M Ueberheide, Jeffrey Shabanowitz, Donald F Hunt and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jun LiCenter for Microbial and Plant Genomics, and Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Michelle M Riehle
Yan Zhang
Jiannong Xu
Frederick Oduol
Shawn M Gomez
Karin Eiglmeier
Beatrix M Ueberheide
Jeffrey Shabanowitz
Donald F Hunt
José M C Ribeiro
Kenneth D Vernick

Funding

PROTEIN SEQUENCING BY TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRYR01GM037537 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI HUNT, DONALD F · 1987 to 2023
$17.8M
Genomics of Mosquito Resistance to PlasmodiumR01AI042361 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI VERNICK, KENNETH D · 1998 to 2012
$4.8M
Vector-Borne Diseases: Biology Of Vector Host RelationshipZ01AI000810 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI RIBEIRO, JOSE M · 1997 to 2008
$3.5M
Proteomics of mosquito immune response to malariaR21AI053777 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI VERNICK, KENNETH D · 2002 to 2003
$314k
NIAID NIH HHS AI42361NIAID NIH HHS AI53777NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI042361NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI053777NIGMS NIH HHS GM37537NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplete genome annotation is a necessary tool as Anopheles gambiae researchers probe the biology of this potent malaria vector.

resultsWe reannotate the A. gambiae genome by synthesizing comparative and ab initio sets of predicted coding sequences (CDSs) into a single set using an exon-gene-union algorithm followed by an open-reading-frame-selection algorithm. The reannotation predicts 20,970 CDSs supported by at least two lines of evidence, and it lowers the proportion of CDSs lacking start and/or stop codons to only approximately 4%. The reannotated CDS set includes a set of 4,681 novel CDSs not represented in the Ensembl annotation but with EST support, and another set of 4,031 Ensembl-supported genes that undergo major structural and, therefore, probably functional changes in the reannotated set. The quality and accuracy of the reannotation was assessed by comparison with end sequences from 20,249 full-length cDNA clones, and evaluation of mass spectrometry peptide hit rates from an A. gambiae shotgun proteomic dataset confirms that the reannotated CDSs offer a high quality protein database for proteomics. We provide a functional proteomics annotation, ReAnoXcel, obtained by analysis of the new CDSs through the AnoXcel pipeline, which allows functional comparisons of the CDS sets within the same bioinformatic platform. CDS data are available for download.

conclusionComprehensive A. gambiae genome reannotation is achieved through a combination of comparative and ab initio gene prediction algorithms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsAnophelesDNA, ComplementaryFrameshift MutationGenetic VectorsGenomeHumansMalariaModels, GeneticPredictive Value of TestsProteomeReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA, ComplementaryProteome

Identifiers

PMID16569258
PMCPMC1557760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.