Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16569080›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2006

Long-term treatment with atypical antipsychotics and the risk of weight gain : a literature analysis.

Salvatore Gentile

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Metabolic and behavioral effects of olanzapine and fluoxetine on the model organismSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cardiometabolic effects of psychotropic medications.Hormone molecular biology and clinical investigation · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Adverse effects of psychotropic medications in children: predictive factors.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2014
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Health Information Preference among Youth and Caregivers related to Second-Generation Antipsychotic Treatment.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2012
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Salvatore GentileDepartment of Mental Health ASL Salerno 1, Mental Health Center n. 4, Cava de' Tirreni, Salerno, Italy. salvatore.gentile@alice.it
Azienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review is to analyse and summarise the literature data about the incidence of weight gain in patients exposed to atypical antipsychotics during long-term (>or=1 year) treatment regimens. Despite the clinical relevance of the topic, the vast majority of reviewed studies showed methodological limitations. Some trials had retrospective analysis, and concomitant medications also associated with an increased risk of weight gain, such as antidepressants and mood stabilisers, were often prescribed. Results were obtained from clinical trials conducted using flexible dosages; thus, the relationship between dosage and weight change was not explored adequately. Also, in a large number of studies, the average antipsychotic daily dose was lower than the usual dosage in clinical practice. Moreover, weight gain was evaluated by different measures, such as mean weight gain in the enrolled population, percentage of patients who gained >7% of basal weight or body mass index (BMI) variations from baseline. In short-term studies, a definite rank order of weight-gain potential among atypical antipsychotics has been demonstrated: clozapine is related to the highest risk of weight gain, followed in decreasing order of magnitude by olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, amisulpride, aripiprazole and ziprasidone. However, in long-term studies, except for clozapine at one end of the scale and ziprasidone at the other, the differences in weight-gain liability showed by the other atypical antipsychotics became less intense. Differences between short-term and long-term treatment could be due to a complex overlapping of different factors, both drug-specific (relative receptorial affinity; timing of weight change plateau; and drug-specific/dose-dependent weight gain), and patient-specific (genetic vulnerability; sex; age; BMI; weight before starting antipsychotic treatment; type of psychiatric disorder; and individual lifestyle). There is an urgent need for well designed, randomised controlled trials to assess firmly both the differential effects of atypical antipsychotics on weight and the role of other factors in contributing to iatrogenic unwanted weight changes. Meanwhile, the well known benefits shown by some atypical antipsychotics in reducing akathisia and other extrapyramidal adverse effects and improving cognition should be carefully balanced with the problems of weight gain, other metabolic complications and higher health care costs.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsHumansRiskTime FactorsWeight GainAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID16569080
OpenAlexW2052397563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.