Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16567497›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2006

Controversy fuels trafficking of GPI-anchored proteins.

Sebastian Schuck, Kai Simons

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Zwitterionic Character and Lipid Composition Determine the Behaviour of Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Fragments in Monolayers.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Sphingomyelin is sorted at the trans Golgi network into a distinct class of secretory vesicle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lipid-modified morphogens: functions of fats.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2009
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A chemical approach to unraveling the biological function of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sebastian SchuckMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Kai Simons

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The model that glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins (GPI-APs) take a direct transport route to the apical membrane of epithelial cells has recently been challenged. In this issue, Paladino et al. (p. 1023) and Hua et al. (p. 1035) show that the original view nevertheless holds. This closes a chapter in the winding story of GPI-AP trafficking but opens another phase, as the controversy has stimulated the development of new methodology.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell PolarityEndocytosisEpithelial CellsGlycosylphosphatidylinositolsGolgi ApparatusLaser Scanning CytometryMembrane ProteinsModels, BiologicalProtein TransportGlycosylphosphatidylinositolsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16567497
PMCPMC2063753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.