Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16566856›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2006

Optimal settings of fingerprint-type analysing computer software for the analysis of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns.

E Yokoyama, M Uchimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E YokoyamaDivision of Bacteriology, Chiba Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Chiba, Japan. e.ykym@ma.pref.chiba.lg.jp
M Uchimura

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Settings of fingerprint-type analysing computer software were optimized for analysis of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns. Under the lowest values of parameters, maximum value of similarities calculated using the Dice coefficient were obtained between PFGE patterns from one EHEC strain on the same gel when reference lanes for calibration of distortions during electrophoresis were set to every fourth lane. PFGE patterns of 15 EHEC strains on different gels were investigated. Similarity values calculated using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (Pearson correlation) were significantly higher than those using the Dice coefficient with optimal values of parameters determined by the program (P < 0.01). When PFGE patterns of 45 EHEC strains were analysed by the computer program, EHEC strains from one mass outbreak and three intra-family outbreaks were each clustered and the similarity values within the clusters were > 90% using Pearson correlation.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldSoftwareCalibrationDNA FingerprintingEscherichia coliImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReference ValuesStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID16566856
PMCPMC2870499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.