ArticleJournal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)2006
Chinese medicinal herbs for influenza: a systematic review.
Article in Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Chinese herbs in treatment of influenza: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Respiratory medicine · 2010Trial
- Review
- Maoto, a Traditional Japanese Herbal Medicine, Inhibits Uncoating of Influenza Virus.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017Article
- The cytokine storm of severe influenza and development of immunomodulatory therapy.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2016Review
- Traditional Chinese medicine treatments for upper respiratory tract infections/common colds in Taiwan.European journal of integrative medicine · 2014Article
- Characteristics of human infection with avian influenza viruses and development of new antiviral agents.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2013Review
- Using Complementary and Alternative Medicines to Target the Host Response during Severe Influenza.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Reprint of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfluenza is an acute respiratory communicable disease which can cause high morbidity and mortality in an epidemic. Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs following a particular theory may be a potential medicine of choice.
objectivesWe aim to assess the therapeutic effect and adverse reaction of traditional Chinese medicinal herbs in the treatment of uncomplicated influenza. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBM, and handsearched the relevant Chinese journals. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials compared with placebo, or with other chemical drugs normally used in care, or various other Chinese medicinal herbs amd chemical drugs with herbal preparations compared with simple chemical drugs were also included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two reviewers extracted data and assessed trial quality. MAIN
resultsWe included 8 relevant studies, most of which were of low quality. Because of the clinical heterogeneity, we did not perform a summary meta-analysis. Some of the studies showed positive results favouring Traditional Chinese medicinal herb treatment compared to antiviral or antipyretic-analgesic drugs or the combination of them. Only three studies mentioned adverse reactions but no detailed data were acquired in the included studies. REVIEWERS'
conclusionsThe small number of included studies and participants, as well as the low quality of most studies, made the evidence far from conclusive for clinical decision making. More high quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with similar interventions are required to strengthen the evidence for the efficacy and safety of certain herbal preparations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.