Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16565914›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2006

Monitoring of mental health systems and services: comparison of four existing indicator schemes.

Shekhar Saxena, Mark van Ommeren, Antonio Lora, Benedetto Saraceno

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Information for global mental health.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2015
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of the WHO Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shekhar SaxenaMental Health: Evidence and Research, Dept. of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia, Geneva, 1211 Switzerland. saxenas@who.int
Mark van Ommeren
Antonio Lora
Benedetto Saraceno

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA public mental health indicator scheme may be defined as a systematic collection of brief proxy measures that represent summary information on variables that are potentially influenced by or relevant to mental health systems, programmes and services. Existing public mental health indicator schemes have been developed in or for high-income countries.

methodThe paper describes and compares four existing high-income country public mental health indicator schemes and highlights key observations.

resultsThe range of indicators and subclasses of indicators covered by the four existing schemes is large. There was only one item (indicator) that was covered by more than one scheme.

conclusionsThe variety of possibilities in indicators and types of indicators suggests a lack of consensus in the essential contents of an indicator scheme. There is a need for a public mental health indicator scheme that is applicable in resource-poor countries.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsCross-Cultural ComparisonEnglandEuropean UnionHumansInformation SystemsMental DisordersMental Health ServicesUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.