Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16565745›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2006

Control of daily transcript oscillations in Drosophila by light and the circadian clock.

Herman Wijnen, Felix Naef, Catharine Boothroyd, Adam Claridge-Chang, Michael W Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Natural alleles of the clock geneFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Light Stimuli and Circadian Clock Affect Neural Development inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Herman WijnenLaboratory of Genetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA.
Felix Naef
Catharine Boothroyd
Adam Claridge-Chang
Michael W Young

Funding

Molecular and Cellular Studies of Circadian RhythmsR37GM054339 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, MICHAEL WARREN · 2009 to 2018
$3.8M
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR STUDIES OF CIRCADIAN RHYTHMSR01GM054339 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, MICHAEL WARREN · 1997 to 2008
$3.2M
Output of the Circadian ClockF32MH063579 · NIMH · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI WIJNEN, HERMAN · 2001 to 2003
$127k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM54339NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054339NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM054339NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH063579NIMH NIH HHS MH63579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transcriptional circuits of circadian clocks control physiological and behavioral rhythms. Light may affect such overt rhythms in two ways: (1) by entraining the clock circuits and (2) via clock-independent molecular pathways. In this study we examine the relationship between autonomous transcript oscillations and light-driven transcript responses. Transcript profiles of wild-type and arrhythmic mutant Drosophila were recorded both in the presence of an environmental photocycle and in constant darkness. Systematic autonomous oscillations in the 12- to 48-h period range were detectable only in wild-type flies and occurred preferentially at the circadian period length. However, an extensive program of light-driven expression was confirmed in arrhythmic mutant flies. Many light-responsive transcripts are preferentially expressed in the compound eyes and the phospholipase C component of phototransduction, NORPA (no receptor potential), is required for their light-dependent regulation. Although there is evidence for the existence of multiple molecular clock circuits in cyanobacteria, protists, plants, and fungi, Drosophila appears to possess only one such system. The sustained photic expression responses identified here are partially coupled to the circadian clock and may reflect a mechanism for flies to modulate functions such as visual sensitivity and synaptic transmission in response to seasonal changes in photoperiod.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmAnimalsCluster AnalysisDrosophilaGene Expression RegulationLightLight Signal TransductionModels, BiologicalMutationOscillometryRNA, MessengerSynaptic TransmissionType C PhospholipasesRNA, MessengerType C Phospholipases

Identifiers

PMID16565745
PMCPMC1413497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.