ArticleBiophysical journal2006
Energetics and dynamics of constrained actin filament bundling.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liquid-like condensates mediate competition between actin branching and bundling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Liquid-like condensates mediate competition between actin branching and bundling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Interplay between Brownian motion and cross-linking controls bundling dynamics in actin networks.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Efficient simulation of thermally fluctuating biopolymers immersed in fluids on 1-micron, 1-second scales.Journal of computational physics · 2019Article
- Assembly kinetics determine the architecture of α-actinin crosslinked F-actin networks.Nature communications · 2012Article
- Modeling the formation of in vitro filopodia.Journal of mathematical biology · 2011Article
- A mechanochemical model explains interactions between cortical microtubules in plants.Biophysical journal · 2010Article
- Article
- Actin bundling: initiation mechanisms and kinetics.Physical review letters · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The formation of filopodia-like bundles from a dendritic actin network has been observed to occur in vitro as a result of branching induced by Arp2/3 complex. We study both the energetics and dynamics of actin filament bundling in such a network to evaluate their relative importance in bundle formation processes. Our model considers two semiflexible actin filaments fixed at one end and free at the other, described using a normal-mode approximation. This model is studied by both Brownian dynamics and free-energy minimization methods. Remarkably, even short filaments can bundle at separations comparable to their lengths. In the dynamic simulations, we evaluate the time required for the filaments to interact and bind, and examine the dependence of this bundling time on the filament length, the distance between the filament bases, and the cross-linking energy. In most cases, bundling occurs in a second or less. Beyond a certain critical distance, we find that the bundling time increases very rapidly with increasing interfilament separation and/or decreasing filament length. For most of the cases we have studied, the energetics results for this critical distance are similar to those obtained from dynamics simulations run for 10 s, suggesting that beyond this timescale, energetics, rather than kinetic constraints, determine whether or not bundling occurs. Over a broad range of conditions, we find that the times required for bundling from a network are compatible with experimental observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.