Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16563186›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2006

Phylogenetic and structural analysis of centromeric DNA and kinetochore proteins.

Patrick Meraldi, Andrew D McAinsh, Esther Rheinbay, Peter K Sorger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed
32.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 274 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biomolecular NMR assignments · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular evolution of the mammalian kinetochore complex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Lessons from the deep: mechanisms behind diversification of eukaryotic protein complexes.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023
    Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick MeraldiDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Andrew D McAinsh
Esther Rheinbay
Peter K Sorger
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USMarie Curie · GB

Funding

BIOCHEMICAL AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF YEAST KINETOCHORESR01GM051464 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SORGER, PETER KARL · 1994 to 2010
$3.9M
CELL AND TUMOR GENETICS OF MITOTIC ARREST CHECKPOINTSR01CA084179 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SORGER, PETER KARL · 2000 to 2010
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA84179NCI NIH HHS R01 CA084179NIGMS NIH HHS GM51464NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM051464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKinetochores are large multi-protein structures that assemble on centromeric DNA (CEN DNA) and mediate the binding of chromosomes to microtubules. Comprising 125 base-pairs of CEN DNA and 70 or more protein components, Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochores are among the best understood. In contrast, most fungal, plant and animal cells assemble kinetochores on CENs that are longer and more complex, raising the question of whether kinetochore architecture has been conserved through evolution, despite considerable divergence in CEN sequence.

resultsUsing computational approaches, ranging from sequence similarity searches to hidden Markov model-based modeling, we show that organisms with CENs resembling those in S. cerevisiae (point CENs) are very closely related and that all contain a set of 11 kinetochore proteins not found in organisms with complex CENs. Conversely, organisms with complex CENs (regional CENs) contain proteins seemingly absent from point-CEN organisms. However, at least three quarters of known kinetochore proteins are present in all fungi regardless of CEN organization. At least six of these proteins have previously unidentified human orthologs. When fungi and metazoa are compared, almost all have kinetochores constructed around Spc105 and three conserved multi-protein linker complexes (MIND, COMA, and the NDC80 complex).

conclusionOur data suggest that critical structural features of kinetochores have been well conserved from yeast to man. Surprisingly, phylogenetic analysis reveals that human kinetochore proteins are as similar in sequence to their yeast counterparts as to presumptive Drosophila melanogaster or Caenorhabditis elegans orthologs. This finding is consistent with evidence that kinetochore proteins have evolved very rapidly relative to components of other complex cellular structures.

Indexed as

CentromereDNA, FungalDNA ReplicationKinetochoresPhylogenySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNA, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16563186
PMCPMC1557759
OpenAlexW2165268265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.