Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16556912›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2006

Protein assembly and DNA looping by the FokI restriction endonuclease.

Lucy E Catto, Sumita Ganguly, Susan E Milsom, Abigail J Welsh, Stephen E Halford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Monomeric site-specific nucleases for genome editing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucy E CattoDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.
Sumita Ganguly
Susan E Milsom
Abigail J Welsh
Stephen E Halford
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 063111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The FokI restriction endonuclease recognizes an asymmetric DNA sequence and cuts both strands at fixed positions upstream of the site. The sequence is contacted by a single monomer of the protein, but the monomer has only one catalytic centre and forms a dimer to cut both strands. FokI is also known to cleave DNA with two copies of its site more rapidly than DNA with one copy. To discover how FokI acts at a single site and how it acts at two sites, its reactions were examined on a series of plasmids with either one recognition site or with two sites separated by varied distances, sometimes in the presence of a DNA-binding defective mutant of FokI. These experiments showed that, to cleave DNA with one site, the monomer bound to that site associates via a weak protein-protein interaction with a second monomer that remains detached from the recognition sequence. Nevertheless, the second monomer catalyses phosphodiester bond hydrolysis at the same rate as the DNA-bound monomer. On DNA with two sites, two monomers of FokI interact strongly, as a result of being tethered to the same molecule of DNA, and sequester the intervening DNA in a loop.

Indexed as

Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDimerizationDNAKineticsMutationNucleic Acid ConformationPlasmidsSubstrate SpecificityDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNAendodeoxyribonuclease FokI

Identifiers

PMID16556912
PMCPMC1410913
OpenAlexW2151143554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.