Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16556656›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2006

The effect of sustained low-intensity contractions on supraspinal fatigue in human elbow flexor muscles.

Karen Søgaard, Simon C Gandevia, Gabrielle Todd, Nicolas T Petersen, Janet L Taylor

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 313 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen SøgaardNational Institute of Occupational Health, Lersø Parkalle 102, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. ks@ami.dk
Simon C Gandevia
Gabrielle Todd
Nicolas T Petersen
Janet L Taylor
Neuroscience Research Australia · AUDanish National Institute of Public Health · DKUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subjects quickly fatigue when they perform maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs). Much of the loss of force is from processes within muscle (peripheral fatigue) but some occurs because voluntary activation of the muscle declines (central fatigue). The role of central fatigue during submaximal contractions is not clear. This study investigated whether central fatigue developed during prolonged low-force voluntary contractions. Subjects (n=9) held isometric elbow flexions of 15% MVC for 43 min. Voluntary activation was measured during brief MVCs every 3 min. During each MVC, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was followed by stimulation of either brachial plexus or the motor nerve of biceps brachii. After nerve stimulation, a resting twitch was also evoked before subjects resumed the 15% MVC. Perceived effort, elbow flexion torque and surface EMG from biceps, brachioradialis and triceps were recorded. TMS was also given during the sustained 15% MVC. During the sustained contraction, perceived effort rose from approximately 2 to approximately 8 (out of 10) while ongoing biceps EMG increased from 6.9+/-2.1% to 20.0+/-7.8% of initial maximum. Torque in the brief MVCs and the resting twitch fell to 58.6+/-14.5 and 58.2+/-13.2% of control values, respectively. EMG in the MVCs also fell to 62.2+/-15.3% of initial maximum, and twitches evoked by nerve stimulation and TMS grew progressively. Voluntary activation calculated from these twitches fell from approximately 98% to 71.9+/-38.9 and 76.9+/-18.3%, respectively. The silent period following TMS lengthened both in the brief MVCs (by approximately 40 ms) and in the sustained target contraction (by approximately 18 ms). After the end of the sustained contraction, the silent period recovered immediately, voluntary activation and voluntary EMG recovered over several minutes while MVC torque only returned to approximately 85% baseline. The resting twitch showed no recovery. Thus, as well as fatigue in the muscle, the prolonged low-force contraction produced progressive central fatigue, and some of this impairment of the subjects' ability to drive the muscle maximally was due to suboptimal output from the motor cortex. Although caused by a low-force contraction, both the peripheral and central fatigue impaired the production of maximal voluntary force. While central fatigue can only be demonstrated during MVCs, it may have contributed to the disproportionate increase in perceived effort reported during the prolonged low-force contraction.

Indexed as

AdultElbow JointElectric StimulationElectromyographyFemaleHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMiddle AgedMuscle FatigueMuscle, SkeletalTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID16556656
PMCPMC1779725
OpenAlexW1565811835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.