Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16556312›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2006

Heterologous expression of Brucella abortus GroEL heat-shock protein in Lactococcus lactis.

Anderson Miyoshi, Luis G Bermúdez-Humarán, Luciana A Ribeiro, Yves Le Loir, Sérgio C Oliveira, Philippe Langella, Vasco Azevedo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Development and trial of vaccines againstJournal of veterinary science · 2017
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Use of lactic acid bacteria as mucosal vaccines].Revue francophone des laboratoires : RFL · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cloning and Expression ofAvicenna journal of medical biotechnology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Anderson MiyoshiInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte - MG, Brasil. miyoshi@icb.ufmg.br
Luis G Bermúdez-Humarán
Luciana A Ribeiro
Yves Le Loir
Sérgio C Oliveira
Philippe Langella
Vasco Azevedo
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique · MADépartement Génétique Animale · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrucella abortus is a facultative intracellular pathogen that mainly infects cattle and humans. Current vaccines rely on live attenuated strains of B. abortus, which can revert to their pathogenic status and thus are not totally safe for use in humans. Therefore, the development of mucosal live vaccines using the food-grade lactic acid bacterium, Lactococcus lactis, as an antigen delivery vector, is an attractive alternative and a safer vaccination strategy against B. abortus. Here, we report the construction of L. lactis strains genetically modified to produce B. abortus GroEL heat-shock protein, a candidate antigen, in two cellular locations, intracellular or secreted.

resultsOnly the secreted form of GroEL was stably produced in L. lactis, suggesting a detrimental effect of GroEL protein when intracellularly produced in this bacterium. Only trace amounts of mature GroEL were detected in the supernatant fraction of induced lactococcal cultures, and the GroEL precursor remained stacked in the cell fraction. Attempts to raise the secretion yields were made, but even when GroEL was fused to a synthetic propeptide, secretion of this antigen was not improved.

conclusionWe found that L. lactis is able to produce, and to secrete, a stable form of GroEL into the extracellular medium. Despite the low secretion efficiency of GroEL, which suggest that this antigen interacts with the cell envelope of L. lactis, secretion seems to be the best way to achieve both production and protein yields, regardless of cellular location. The L. lactis strain secreting GroEL has potential for in vivo immunization.

Identifiers

PMID16556312
PMCPMC1444932
OpenAlexW1529625998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.