Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16552505›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2006

Janus computerised prescribing system provides pharmacological knowledge at point of care - design, development and proof of concept.

Marie Eliasson, Pia Bastholm, Peter Forsberg, Kjell Henriksson, Lennart Jacobson, Anders Nilsson, Lars L Gustafsson

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Computerized clinical decision support for prescribing: provision does not guarantee uptake.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marie EliassonDepartment of Drug Management and Informatics, Stockholm Health Region, Sweden. marie.eliasson@sll.se
Pia Bastholm
Peter Forsberg
Kjell Henriksson
Lennart Jacobson
Anders Nilsson
Lars L Gustafsson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and verify proof of concept for a user-defined prescribing system with decision support based on one single database consisting of several pharmacological sources.

methodsA multidisciplinary working group within the framework of a two-phase project developed the tool. A small-scale pilot study for proof of concept was carried out in an outpatient neurological polyclinic where four experienced physicians used the tool in patient care on a daily basis.

resultsAutomatically generated functions, such as recommended drugs, alerts for interactions, alerts for drug therapy during pregnancy and breast-feeding and a search tool for adverse drug effects, were quickly adopted into the daily outpatient working regime. Functions such as treatment strategies and a link to a producer independent website were less frequently used but still rated as useful and educational.

conclusionSearches for information that can be concentrated in one system saves time. Alerts inevitably draw physicians' attention to the information. Instant availability to drug recommendations in a computerised prescribing system such as Janus should increase adherence to recommendations, but this needs to be evaluated systematically. Small-scale pilot studies such as the one reported here have been shown to be invaluable in providing the theoretical basis for implementation of the system and for gaining an understanding of the complex change processes involved. Small-scale projects can therefore provided a base for further development and broader implementation of pharmacological tools and services.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsBreast FeedingDatabases, FactualDrug InteractionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug Therapy, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsPregnancy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.